Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On 05-06-13 18:30, Michael Tautschnig wrote: >> I also like it, somewhat, but am also aware of this approach rendering >> unstable more stable than testing. I would prefer another kind of punishment >> for neglect / some difficulty than the mere removal. > > In what way exactly would this effort e

Re: Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:15:14PM +0200, "Steffen Möller" a écrit : > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:37:54AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > > > > > > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 04-06-13 14:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > [1] We normally filter out certain type of RC bugs (incl. but not > limited to license issues), where we consider it unreasonable to demand > a resolution within the usual deadline (i.e. 14 days of "non-activity" + > 7 days after a d-d notice). > # #7

Re: Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> Hi, > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:37:54AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > > > > > > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > > > > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > >

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013, "Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)" wrote: > On 04/06/2013 14:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > > > The packages have been selected based on the

Aw: Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi, > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:37:54AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > > > > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > > > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > > > > > The p

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:37:54AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > > > The packages have

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Ma, 04 iun 13, 14:06:26, Niels Thykier wrote: > > [1] We normally filter out certain type of RC bugs (incl. but not > limited to license issues), where we consider it unreasonable to demand > a resolution within the usual deadline (i.e. 14 days of "non-activity" + > 7 days after a d-d notice).

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > The packages have been selected based on the following criteria: > * The package had at least one

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Holger Levsen
On Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Thanks a lot for this initiative! I hope this leads to a shorter freeze > this cycle. +1 - keep the removals coming ;-) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)
On 04/06/2013 14:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > The packages have been selected based on the following criteria: > * The package had at least one RC bug without ac

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Joey Hess
Seems I confused xgalaga with xgalaga++, which does use dh. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Joey Hess
Paul Wise wrote: > Control: severity -1 grave > Control: reassign -1 debhelper 9.20130518 > Control: affects -1 + src:xgalaga++ > Control: tags -1 - jessie > > The FTBFS bug against xgalaga++ (#707481) is caused by debhelper, it > builds fine with debhelper 9.20120909 but not with debhelper > 9.20

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 04/06/13 14:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > The packages have been selected based on the following criteria: > * The package had at least one RC bug without acti

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Paul Wise
Control: severity -1 grave Control: reassign -1 debhelper 9.20130518 Control: affects -1 + src:xgalaga++ Control: tags -1 - jessie The FTBFS bug against xgalaga++ (#707481) is caused by debhelper, it builds fine with debhelper 9.20120909 but not with debhelper 9.20130518. It appears that debhelper