Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no writes:
]] Simon McVittie
| In the meantime, is there consensus that shuffling the development files
into
| /usr/lib/triplet too is at least harmless, and that Multi-Arch: same is
| appropriate for -dev packages where all the arch-dependent files are in
|
Simon McVittie s...@debian.org writes:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:17:19PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
In the meantime, is there consensus that shuffling the development files
into
/usr/lib/triplet too is at least harmless, and that Multi-Arch: same is
appropriate
Simon McVittie s...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 at 20:46:18 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Goswin wrote:
Looks fine from here. How does your -dev package look? The .so link, .la
and .pc files (if any) are specifically important.
The -dev package has no Multi-Arch field,
]] Simon McVittie
| In the meantime, is there consensus that shuffling the development files into
| /usr/lib/triplet too is at least harmless, and that Multi-Arch: same is
| appropriate for -dev packages where all the arch-dependent files are in
| arch-specific directories? I'd rather not break
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:17:19PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 at 20:46:18 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Goswin wrote:
Looks fine from here. How does your -dev package look? The .so link, .la
and .pc files (if any) are specifically important.
The -dev
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:17:19PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
In the meantime, is there consensus that shuffling the development files
into
/usr/lib/triplet too is at least harmless, and that Multi-Arch: same is
appropriate for -dev packages where all the
(Please cc me on this thread, I'm not subscribed to debian-devel.)
Goswin wrote:
Looks fine from here. How does your -dev package look? The .so link, .la
and .pc files (if any) are specifically important.
The -dev package has no Multi-Arch field, which seems to be how the multiarch
spec on the
Simon McVittie s...@debian.org writes:
(Please cc me on this thread, I'm not subscribed to debian-devel.)
Goswin wrote:
Looks fine from here. How does your -dev package look? The .so link, .la
and .pc files (if any) are specifically important.
The -dev package has no Multi-Arch field,
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 at 20:46:18 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Goswin wrote:
Looks fine from here. How does your -dev package look? The .so link, .la
and .pc files (if any) are specifically important.
The -dev package has no Multi-Arch field, which seems to be how the
multiarch
Simon McVittie s...@debian.org writes:
Since libdbus appears in ia32-libs and isn't particularly large, and I
wanted to make an experimental upload anyway (to add a -dbg package
while avoiding the NEW queue blocking unstable), I've prepared a
hopefully multiarch-compatible version of it,
Since libdbus appears in ia32-libs and isn't particularly large, and I
wanted to make an experimental upload anyway (to add a -dbg package
while avoiding the NEW queue blocking unstable), I've prepared a
hopefully multiarch-compatible version of it, which uses
/lib/${DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE} (libdbus
Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 21:44 +0100, Bill Allombert a écrit :
Dear developers,
Debian policy 3.8.4.0 has been uploaded today with the following changes:
* An FHS exception has been granted for multiarch libraries.
Permitting files to instead be installed to `/lib/triplet' and
Hi,
2010/1/27 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org:
Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 21:44 +0100, Bill Allombert a écrit :
Dear developers,
Debian policy 3.8.4.0 has been uploaded today with the following changes:
* An FHS exception has been granted for multiarch libraries.
Permitting files
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:59:00PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 21:44 +0100, Bill Allombert a écrit :
Dear developers,
Debian policy 3.8.4.0 has been uploaded today with the following changes:
* An FHS exception has been granted for multiarch libraries.
14 matches
Mail list logo
