On Saturday 07 May 2005 16.56, Brad and Billie Fick wrote:
> do you know how I can get the sheet music to this? If so I would greatly
> appreciate it. Thank you
There we go again. I am so glad this happens, helps to lighten the mood
everywhere and certainly eases the way to general happiness in
NOTHING strikes me as bizzare at [EMAIL PROTECTED] anymore...
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Mike Markley wrote:
> Does anyone else find it bizarre that this is the *second* such request this
> list has received in recent months? :)
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:49:47AM -0700, marty macdonald <[EMAIL PR
Today, Miros/law `Jubal' Baran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 13.09.2000 pisze Rick Younie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Probably doesn't make any sense to many non-native English
>> speakers or those from different cultures but it really is
>> hilarious.
> It did make sense. ;->
Yea, but only if you spe
13.09.2000 pisze Rick Younie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Probably doesn't make any sense to many non-native English
> speakers or those from different cultures but it really is
> hilarious.
It did make sense. ;->
Jubal, from different culture.
--
[ Miros/law L Baran, baran-at-knm-org-pl, neg IQ, ce
* marty macdonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000912 22:52]:
> I mean, the whole thing here is to show the ultimate
> differences between the Linux kernel and the kernels
> found when using multiple banjos. This research was
> supported by Dr. Rimulak in his infamous "Kernal VS
> Banjo - A Duality?". Th
"Jaldhar H. Vyas" proclaimed:
> A team at IBM is currently trying to port the Linux Kernel to
> Britney Spears but it is highly experimental and the system may
> never be stable under such hostile conditions.
The Britney Spears banjo, it should also be noted, is prone to inexplicably
and suddenl
Does anyone else find it bizarre that this is the *second* such request this
list has received in recent months? :)
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:49:47AM -0700, marty macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spake forth:
> Hi,
>
> I saw your ad about sheet music for this.
>
> Could you please send it to me?
d the kernels
found when using multiple banjos. This research was
supported by Dr. Rimulak in his infamous "Kernal VS
Banjo - A Duality?". This is a must read!
Howard
Subject: Re: dualing banjos
--- "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 10:51:23AM -0500, "Keith G. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> The 2.4 kernel, of course, will support any number of banjos. (Well,
> 65535, but who needs more than that?) :-)
"No-one needs more than 640 kilobytes of memory"...
Daniel
--
/
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> So far, the Linux kernel only supports single, not dual banjos.
>
> There is, however, a patch available that will make the 2.2 kernel
> support up to 15 banjos.
>
> The 2.4 kernel, of course, will support any number of banjos. (Well,
> 65535, but
marty macdonald wrote:
>
So far, the Linux kernel only supports single, not dual banjos.
There is, however, a patch available that will make the 2.2 kernel
support up to 15 banjos.
The 2.4 kernel, of course, will support any number of banjos. (Well,
65535, but who needs more than that?) :-)
11 matches
Mail list logo