Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 14:40:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
As I mentioned in the long ref-counting thread, I strongly disagree this
is a correct solution, it just seems like a hack to me. Instead I
think
Hi,
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Andreas Barth wrote:
Asking to be sure: For sbuild, that means instead of changing the file
debian/changelog before starting the build, a new file
debian/changelog.binary-rebuild (or however it is named) is created
and from there on all works by itself?
That's the
On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 14:40:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
As I mentioned in the long ref-counting thread, I strongly disagree this
is a correct solution, it just seems like a hack to me. Instead I
think we should consider changelog (and copyright
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
This allows us to get rid of the special-casing of bin-nmu in dpkg where
we only support one extension (+bX).
We have many other cases where it would be helpful to be able to do such
binary-only rebuild in different environments and where it
Guillem Jover wrote:
By definition a binNMU cannot produce a source package anyway, so I
fail to see the point in this artifical need to distinguish “source”
and “binary” changelogs through different files, AFAIR I already
Why artificial? Isn't it a completely natural and consistent view to
* Raphael Hertzog (hert...@debian.org) [120612 13:10]:
1/ we modify dpkg to ignore differences on /usr/share/doc/*/changelog.*gz
for multi-arch: same packages
Doesn't sound too bad to me, at least for short-term (where I'd tend
to take the changelog-version of the main architecture on
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
As such, I suggest that we handle binary rebuild differently:
- debian/changelog is left unmodified since it's the source changelog
= it defines the ${source:Version} substvar
- debian/changelog.binary-rebuild (or any other better name) is created
when we want to
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
As such, I suggest that we handle binary rebuild differently:
- debian/changelog is left unmodified since it's the source changelog
= it defines the ${source:Version} substvar
- debian/changelog.binary-rebuild (or any
* Raphael Hertzog (hert...@debian.org) [120610 20:44]:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
As such, I suggest that we handle binary rebuild differently:
- debian/changelog is left unmodified since it's the source changelog
= it defines the
Andreas Barth wrote:
Do we have other tools than dpkg that parse the changelog to find out
the package version?
Yes, debian/rules parses the changelog in a low-tech way in some
source packages. Someone with access to the lintian lab might be able
to say how many packages would be hurt by not
10 matches
Mail list logo
