Dear DDs/DMs,
If you want to follow this thread, look at https://bugs.debian.org/972608
Cheers,
Xavier
Quoting Julien Puydt (2020-10-20 18:40:10)
> Le mardi 20 octobre 2020 à 18:00 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > > > - bad: the tarball contains the whole sources (no repack) ;
> > > > - bad: the bare checkout isn't cleared.
> > >
> > > Still current.
> >
> > Please file bugreports about
Le 20/10/2020 à 18:40, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> Le mardi 20 octobre 2020 à 18:00 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
- bad: the tarball contains the whole sources (no repack) ;
- bad: the bare checkout isn't cleared.
>>>
>>> Still current.
>>
>> Please file bugreports about concrete
Le mardi 20 octobre 2020 à 18:00 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > > - bad: the tarball contains the whole sources (no repack) ;
> > > - bad: the bare checkout isn't cleared.
> >
> > Still current.
>
> Please file bugreports about concrete weaknesses of Debian tools.
>
> If you are still
Le lundi 19 octobre 2020 à 10:06 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> You might find some inspiration in the source package
> jsbundle-web-interfaces which uses version type "group" and
> mode=git,
> and sets individual version numbers for each binary package.
>
> Another example is
Quoting Julien Puydt (2020-10-20 16:14:17)
> Le mardi 20 octobre 2020 à 10:02 +0200, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Le lundi 19 octobre 2020 à 20:03 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel a
> > écrit :
> > > what about the git mode of uscan
> > >
> > > then you would have all the tags ?
> >
> >
Le mardi 20 octobre 2020 à 10:02 +0200, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Le lundi 19 octobre 2020 à 20:03 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel a
> écrit :
> > what about the git mode of uscan
> >
> > then you would have all the tags ?
>
> Ah, yes, I had forgotten that!
>
> I tried with a simpler
Hi,
Le lundi 19 octobre 2020 à 20:03 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel a
écrit :
> what about the git mode of uscan
>
> then you would have all the tags ?
Ah, yes, I had forgotten that!
I tried with a simpler version (one component), and my d/watch is :
version=4
opts=\
component=algorithm,\
Hi,
Le lundi 19 octobre 2020 à 11:51 +0200, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> Even in that case, will uscan see the tag subpackage42/3.14 on
> github?
> In my experience, it only sees a handful of last tags, so it will see
> the releases of something like subpackage1/* to subpackage23/*, but
> not the
Hi,
Le lundi 19 octobre 2020 à 20:33 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Quoting Julien Puydt (2020-10-19 19:27:11)
> > Am I getting somewhere with today's tools? Can someone propose a
> > nicer way in the future?
>
> My apologies for mistaking the scope of your question.
And my apologies for
Quoting Julien Puydt (2020-10-19 19:27:11)
> Am I getting somewhere with today's tools? Can someone propose a nicer
> way in the future?
My apologies for mistaking the scope of your question.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website:
Hi,
Le lundi 19 octobre 2020 à 12:15 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Quoting Pirate Praveen (2020-10-19 12:01:47)
> > On 2020, ഒക്ടോബർ 19 12:45:28 PM IST, Julien Puydt
> > wrote:
> > > I was trying to update the ipywidgets package. It once had a
> > > quite
> > > normal upstream, but then
Le lundi 19 octobre 2020 à 16:42 +0530, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:51, Julien Puydt
> wrote:
> > Here is what I have in d/control for my src:lumino experiments :
> >
> > Provides: node-lumino-algorithm (= 1.3.3),
> > node-lumino-application (= 1.11.0),
>
Quoting Pirate Praveen (2020-10-19 13:15:20)
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > To strip upstream content completely from Debian redistribution, use
> > Files-Excluded-foo: in topmost section of debian/copyright - see
> > jsbundle-web-interfaces for an example of that.
Le 19/10/2020 à 12:01, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>
>
> On 2020, ഒക്ടോബർ 19 12:45:28 PM IST, Julien Puydt
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was trying to update the ipywidgets package. It once had a quite
>> normal upstream, but then things went wild, if not stellar : they went
>> monorepo.
> ...
>> So
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
To strip upstream content completely from Debian redistribution, use
Files-Excluded-foo: in topmost section of debian/copyright - see
jsbundle-web-interfaces for an example of that.
To strip upstream content from entering the Debian git
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:51, Julien Puydt
wrote:
Here is what I have in d/control for my src:lumino experiments :
Provides: node-lumino-algorithm (= 1.3.3),
node-lumino-application (= 1.11.0),
node-lumino-collections (= 1.3.3),
node-lumino-commands (=
Quoting Pirate Praveen (2020-10-19 12:01:47)
> On 2020, ഒക്ടോബർ 19 12:45:28 PM IST, Julien Puydt
> wrote:
> >I was trying to update the ipywidgets package. It once had a quite
> >normal upstream, but then things went wild, if not stellar : they
> >went monorepo.
> ...
> >So basically my
Quoting Julien Puydt (2020-10-19 11:51:05)
> Le lundi 19 octobre 2020 à 10:06 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > Quoting Julien Puydt (2020-10-19 09:15:28)
> > > - uscan doesn't work correctly anymore, as the multiplication of
> > > tags makes them disappear in the list quite fast ;
> >
> >
On 2020, ഒക്ടോബർ 19 12:45:28 PM IST, Julien Puydt
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was trying to update the ipywidgets package. It once had a quite
>normal upstream, but then things went wild, if not stellar : they went
>monorepo.
...
>So basically my question is the one in the mail subject : how does one
Hi,
Le lundi 19 octobre 2020 à 10:06 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Hi Julien, and others,
>
> Quoting Julien Puydt (2020-10-19 09:15:28)
> > I was trying to update the ipywidgets package. It once had a quite
> > normal upstream, but then things went wild, if not stellar : they
> > went
>
Hi Julien, and others,
Quoting Julien Puydt (2020-10-19 09:15:28)
> I was trying to update the ipywidgets package. It once had a quite
> normal upstream, but then things went wild, if not stellar : they went
> monorepo.
>
> For those lucky ones who never crossed the principle, the idea is to
22 matches
Mail list logo
