Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is from the linux kernel mailing list. I find it pretty completly sums
op my thoughts on all the new constitution and voting and policy voting
stuff that we've been setting up. I haven't been vocal about this, but I
think we've been moving in the wrong
This is from the linux kernel mailing list. I find it pretty completly sums
op my thoughts on all the new constitution and voting and policy voting
stuff that we've been setting up. I haven't been vocal about this, but I
think we've been moving in the wrong direction.
Of course, this came up on
Brent Fulgham writes:
Witness the latest bloodletting that involved three of the founding
project members leaving after shouts of lawsuits and other hysteria
against them.
The only mention of lawsuits that I recall was the fear expressed by them
that they might be sued by a third party for the
on linux kernel because Linus is showing signs of
burnout - just like Bruce burnt out. The benevolent dicator system isn't
perfect.
- Forwarded message from Larry McVoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry McVoy)
Subject: Re: Linus is on a powertrip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) wrote on 02.10.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is from the linux kernel mailing list. I find it pretty completly sums
op my thoughts on all the new constitution and voting and policy voting
stuff that we've been setting up. I haven't been vocal about this, but I
Kai Henningsen wrote:
Linus is the main developer for Linux. That makes him a good benevolent
dictator. Debian does not have a main developer; Ian has a political, not
a technical, job.
Linus's position is just as political as Ian's, it's just not so obvious
because the difference in the
6 matches
Mail list logo
