Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a
version number like:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:37:16 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm packaging
Am Donnerstag, 22. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:37:16 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 3/13/07,
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a
version number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
If you use that number, the upstream version
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:40:43AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
If you're building packages for Debian, you should use a Debian machine, not
an Ubuntu machine.
FWIW, you can install cross-distro chroots and use them to build
packages if you need to. Not necessarily recommended for
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Gunnar Wolf:
Please set up the headers accordingly in your mail client :)
What's wrong with my headers?
Lg
Roman
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Gunnar Wolf:
Roman Müllenschläder dijo [Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:43:56PM +0100]:
So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor
the one in stable?
Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running
Edgy ;)
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Roman Müllenschläder:
Hi there ...
I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a version
number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
Reason is the following: I have this packages on my repository for making
it available to users for testing puposes. I
On Thursday 15 March 2007 11:31, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Gunnar Wolf:
Please set up the headers accordingly in your mail client :)
What's wrong with my headers?
Nothing AFAICS, at least not according to the Code of Conduct of these mailing
lists.
Hi,
Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
The problem is that the mentioned lintian warning was fixed in .27 .. so if
testing and unstable are using .28, there should be no problem with just
ignoring the warnings for now and see what my _tests_ on debian will
No, that's wrong. *Build* also on Debian
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
The problem is that the mentioned lintian warning was fixed in .27 .. so
if testing and unstable are using .28, there should be no problem with
just ignoring the warnings for now and see what my _tests_ on
Roman Müllenschläder dijo [Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:23:16PM +0100]:
The versions for lintian (from packages.qa.debian.org) are:
Stable: 1.23.8
Testing:1.23.28
Unstable: 1.23.28
So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor the
one in stable?
Because
Roman Müllenschläder dijo [Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:43:56PM +0100]:
So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor the
one in stable?
Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running Edgy ;)
I know I'm stating the obvious here ... but you
Roman Müllenschläder dijo [Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 12:16:31AM +0100]:
If you're developing packages for Debian, not Ubuntu, I would
suggest at a minimum that you do your builds in a Sid chroot
(pbuilder and/or UML work well for this too, depending on how
powerful your system is). I do
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 12:28:31PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Why is every question I'm asking here treated like me beeing a child in
time,
not able to do the logical?
Testing a package is useless and senseless ... I know that well!
HUH!?!?
Ummmh... If that's how you really feel
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 20.23:16 Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running Edgy ;)
Maybe I should compile lintian by hand ... tried using sources from
feisty but they need to much dependencies ...
If you're building packages for Debian,
On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a version
number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
If you use that number, the upstream version should be 1.0.8~rc1. Is
that the upstream number? If you want to have release
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Margarita Manterola:
On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a
version number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
If you use that number, the upstream version should be 1.0.8~rc1. Is
hi roman,
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 20:23 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Margarita Manterola:
On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a
version number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1
On 3/13/07, sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 20:23 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
If you use that number, the upstream version should be 1.0.8~rc1. Is
that the upstream number? If you want to have release candidates of
your _own_ package, you should do:
[Roman Müllenschläder]
So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor the
one in stable?
Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running Edgy ;)
I know I'm stating the obvious here ... but you shouldn't try to
develop packages for Debian exclusively
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
[Roman Müllenschläder]
So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor the
one in stable?
Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running Edgy ;)
I know I'm stating the obvious here ... but you
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Margarita Manterola:
On 3/13/07, sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 20:23 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
If you use that number, the upstream version should be 1.0.8~rc1. Is
that the upstream number? If you want to have
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
[...]
Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running
Edgy ;)
[...]
If you're developing packages for Debian, not Ubuntu, I would
suggest at a minimum that you do your builds in a Sid chroot
(pbuilder and/or
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb The Fungi:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
[...]
Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running
Edgy ;)
[...]
If you're developing packages for Debian, not Ubuntu, I would
suggest at a minimum
Roman Müllenschläder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb The Fungi:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running
Edgy ;)
If you're developing packages for Debian, not
26 matches
Mail list logo
