Re: New maintainer intending to package pavuk

Policy is not set in stone. There are times when it makes little sense. I say make a console version, then make a X package. The X version can have a gtk and/or Xlib version. Are you also going to help him maintain the upstream source now that he is away? I thought about this back in March,

Re: New maintainer intending to package pavuk

Policy is not set in stone. There are times when it makes little sense. I say make a console version, then make a X package. The X version can have a gtk and/or Xlib version. Are you also going to help him maintain the upstream source now that he is away? I thought about this back in

Re: New maintainer intending to package pavuk

On Wed, Jun 17, 1998 at 08:12:05PM -0400, Shaleh wrote: Policy is not set in stone. There are times when it makes little ^^ But please discuss any violations you intend to commit in debian-policy. I think a policy that is not set in stone is not useful. Ian Jackson