apt-show-versions | grep /experimental
should work too, but I haven't tested it (no experimental packages
installed on this machine)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 14:17 +, Paul Brossier a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Jérôme Warnier]
Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
which have an experimental version?
There might be a better
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 15:04 +0100, Michal Politowski a écrit :
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:34:11 +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
[...]
BTW, is there a way to list all packages in experimental?
aptitude search '~Aexperimental'
Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:25:52PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 14:17 +, Paul Brossier a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Jérôme Warnier]
Or even better: a list of all packages
Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 16:38 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
On Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:35 AM, Jérôme Warnier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
[Jérôme Warnier]
Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
which have an experimental version?
There might be a better way, but assuming you have experimental in your
sources.list...
t=$(tempfile);
awk $t '/^Package:/{print ^ $2 $}' \
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:34:11 +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
[...]
BTW, is there a way to list all packages in experimental?
aptitude search '~Aexperimental'
Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
which have an experimental version?
aptitude search
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Jérôme Warnier]
Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
which have an experimental version?
There might be a better way, but assuming you have experimental in your
sources.list...
aptitude
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:35:45PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
If not, is there a way to
[Jérôme Warnier]
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
Hmmm, I thought experimental was garbage-collected automatically in
this
Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 12:43 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld a écrit :
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:35:45PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
experimental (currently, Sid
On Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:35 AM, Jérôme Warnier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
Further to
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 09:41:29AM +0200 , Michael Meskes wrote:
After upgrading my machine I found some obsolete packages. Before purging
them I'd like to know if there are replacements:
lde
yes. it had RC, and it is still in mess due to some strange gcc header
interactions :(
manpages-net
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 10:08:13AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
manpages-net
this package appeared only for a short time (and yes, I have it installed
too). I think it was in Incoming only.
How about re-creating it?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 01:57:25PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote a free reimplementation of this,
gnuhtml2latex, so html2latex was removed.
Got this too. Thanks.
These both still seem to be in woody.
So maybe they had release critical bugs. I cannot check that right
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 02:25:16PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
# apt-get install intlfonts-european
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Package intlfonts-european has no available version, but exists in the
database.
This typically means that the package was
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:15:22AM -0500, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
eaudio
Um, xmms I think.
Since xmms does not mention eaudio anywhere in its control file I though
these two programs were completely different.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:15:22AM -0500, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
eaudio
Um, xmms I think.
Since xmms does not mention eaudio anywhere in its control file I though
these two programs were completely different.
Well, the author of eaudio dropped
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 09:41:29AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
intlfonts-european
# apt-get install intlfonts-european
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Package intlfonts-european has no available version, but exists in the database.
This typically means that the
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After upgrading my machine I found some obsolete packages. Before purging
them I'd like to know if there are replacements:
html2latex
Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote a free reimplementation of this,
gnuhtml2latex, so html2latex was removed.
lde
gtkbrowser
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
html2latex
tetex, perhaps?
eaudio
Um, xmms I think.
gtkbrowser
Hmmm. No idea.
Mike.
21 matches
Mail list logo
