Re: Should DMs be allowed to upload to NEW

2008-07-04 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le Wednesday 16 April 2008 15:44:56 Neil Williams, vous avez écrit : An upload of a new application is nowhere near as complex as the upload to start a library SONAME transition. Even uploading a new library never seen in

Re: Should DMs be allowed to upload to NEW

2008-04-16 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 15:59 +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: Thanks for the reply. As I said, I am not questioning new SONAME bumps going into NEW. The question is, whether the DMs should be allowed to upload SONAME bumps to NEW by themselves or not. Umm, I would have to say no. Sorry. SONAME

Re: Should DMs be allowed to upload to NEW

2008-04-16 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le Wednesday 16 April 2008 15:44:56 Neil Williams, vous avez écrit : An upload of a new application is nowhere near as complex as the upload to start a library SONAME transition. Even uploading a new library never seen in Debian before is easier than starting a SONAME transition for a library