On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:55:05AM +0100, Erik Schanze wrote:
Joerg Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reading larger parts of the recent threads triggered by the
'Vancouver proposal' brought me to write this mail.
Over the last two years testing became more and more a second
(almost) stable
Steve Langasek wrote:
[snip]
Auto-removal of orphaned packages from unstable is also bad if it's an
orphaned library that's still needed (which happens often enough).
Auto-removal of orphaned (build-)dependency leaves sounds useful.
This would also remove orphaned libraries after a while if the
Hi Joerg!
Joerg Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reading larger parts of the recent threads triggered by the
'Vancouver proposal' brought me to write this mail.
Over the last two years testing became more and more a second
(almost) stable distribution instead of being a preparation area for the
Joerg Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. The number of packages
Debian never stopped growing, and there are packages which are
unmaintained but they are still in the archive.
Hey, if noone is willing to maintain a package, wait a grace period
(30 days) and remove it from
4 matches
Mail list logo