On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Brian May [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:22:55 +1000]:
Adeodate Also, do you remember having root
Adeodato bzr as root?
Huh?
Sorry, that should have read: do you remember having *run* bzr as root.
It's the most likely cause for those .pyc
Le dimanche 27 août 2006 à 19:12 +0200, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
bzrtools 0.9 does not put files under /usr/lib/python2.4, since it
uses python-support; and its maintainer scripts for 0.9 did not
bytecompile the modules, so the most plausible explanation for .pyc
files in /usr/lib/python2.4
Adeodato == Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Robert Could you please run 'bzr upgrade' while using bzr
Robert 0.9rc1. If my guess at your situation is right this will
Robert take a while to run, but correct your performance issues.
Did I do something
Version: 0.9-1
* Brian May [Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:43:24 +1000]:
Robert Could you please run 'bzr upgrade' while using bzr
Robert 0.9rc1. If my guess at your situation is right this will
Robert take a while to run, but correct your performance issues.
Did I do something wrong?
Adeodato == Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Adeodato Hm. I'd say that you have .pyc files left in:
Adeodato
Adeodato /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools
Adeodato Can you check, please?
Yes, see below.
Adeodate Also, do you
* Brian May [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:22:55 +1000]:
Adeodate Also, do you remember having root
Adeodato bzr as root?
Huh?
Sorry, that should have read: do you remember having *run* bzr as root.
It's the most likely cause for those .pyc files to be there, since
bzrtools did not.
Thanks,
Adeodato == Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Adeodato Sorry, that should have read: do you remember having
Adeodato *run* bzr as root. It's the most likely cause for
Adeodato those .pyc files to be there, since bzrtools did not.
No - I don't recall running
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive
appears to be converted successfully - if I do a diff
operation, it reports all files as deleted, but if
* Brian May [Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:53:01 +1000]:
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive
appears to be converted successfully - if I do a diff
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive
appears to be converted successfully - if I do a diff
operation, it reports all files as deleted, but
la, 2006-08-12 kello 15:59 +1000, Brian May kirjoitti:
Are there any Debian packages of 0.9rc1 available?
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/bzr says 0.9~rc1-1.
(Lookup time: about ten seconds. :)
--
On a clear disk, you seek forever.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 15:59 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive
appears to be converted successfully - if I do a
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 12:01 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Curiously though, the problems continue even after the archive appears
to be converted successfully - if I do a diff operation, it reports
all files as deleted, but if I try to revert it, it slows to a
grinding halt.
Could you please run
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 10:58 +1000, Brian May wrote:
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Are you doing conversions from SVN? Current bzr uses 20MB
Robert of ram to do a native branch operation in similar
Robert circumstances. (bug report gets fixed, new at
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Its likely to be a different bug - the conversion approach
Robert used for svn/baz is very different. That said, conversion
Robert from $any system is going to use more memory than native
Robert bzr operations, simply
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Are you doing conversions from SVN? Current bzr uses 20MB
Robert of ram to do a native branch operation in similar
Robert circumstances. (bug report gets fixed, new at 11 :)).
No, this was a conversion from baz. Might be the
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
will operate over either a socketpair - i.e. tunnelling via ssh (which
can still be done without granting shell access), or over plain http via
an apache rewrite rule.
Is it already
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
will operate over either a socketpair - i.e. tunnelling via ssh (which
can still be done without granting shell access),
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
will operate over either a socketpair - i.e. tunnelling via ssh (which
can
Adeodato == Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Adeodato But if you have a set of equal developers, bzr can be
Adeodato also used in a very similar way to Subversion, where all
Adeodato commits go to a central repository, and nobody has to
Adeodato collect
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 09:56 +1000, Brian May wrote:
For documentation on checkouts and bound branches, see
http://bazaar-vcs.org/CheckoutTutorial
http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrUsingBoundBranches
However, I am not convinced the following paragraph in the first
page is correct:
Getting a
* Otavio Salvador [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0300]:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all the
branching, merging, commiting and uncommiting (gotta love that) that
they want, and when they're done, do e.g.:
% bzr push
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Otavio Salvador [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0300]:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all the
branching, merging, commiting and uncommiting (gotta love that) that
they want, and
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 21:44, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Otavio Salvador [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0300]:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all
the branching, merging,
Adeodato Simó, 2006-08-02 21:20:09 +0200 :
% bzr push sftp://costa.debian.org/bzr/pkg-xiph/vorbis-tools
[...]
Ask in #alioth. Note, however, that TTBOMK still does not offer HTTP
access, so if you want that, better stick to htdocs for a while.
I hope to be able to bribe buxy to provide
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 22:29 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
That's in fact an issue that made me feel sceptical about bzr, darcs
and
mercury. All of them require a shell account or some scripting through
a
special mail address to commit changes. And it's not only the recent
kernel
* Adeodato Simó [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:31:37 +0200]:
they want, and when they're done, do e.g.:
% bzr push sftp://costa.debian.org/bzr/pkg-xiph/vorbis-tools
Forgot to add that it can be even _identical_ to subversion, in the
sense that you don't have to commit locally, and then push. Just
also sprach Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1936 +0100]:
Forgot to add that it can be even _identical_ to subversion, in the
sense that you don't have to commit locally, and then push. Just make a
checkout (refer to the bzr docs), and every commit you make will go to
the main repo
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all the
branching, merging, commiting and uncommiting (gotta love that) that
they want, and when they're done, do e.g.:
% bzr push sftp://costa.debian.org/bzr/pkg-xiph/vorbis-tools
We're
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 19:44 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.01.1936 +0100]:
Forgot to add that it can be even _identical_ to subversion, in the
sense that you don't have to commit locally, and then push. Just make a
checkout (refer to the
30 matches
Mail list logo
