On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Gerrit Pape writes (Re: dash Debian package - RC bugs):
I can't help, I don't understand. I yesterday followed up to a mail
that was additionally addressed to the debian-c...@lists.debian.org
mailing list and got an automatic
* Gerrit Pape p...@smarden.org:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Gerrit Pape writes (Re: dash Debian package - RC bugs):
I can't help, I don't understand. I yesterday followed up to a mail
that was additionally addressed to the debian-c...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 08:28:57AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[ It sucks to have to confirm mails for debian-package-d...@list.smarden.org ]
I can't help, I don't understand. I yesterday followed up to a mail
that was additionally addressed to the debian-c...@lists.debian.org
mailing list
On 08/31/2010 02:08 PM, Gerrit Pape wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 08:28:57AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[ It sucks to have to confirm mails for debian-package-d...@list.smarden.org
]
I can't help, I don't understand. I yesterday followed up to a mail
that was additionally addressed to
On Ma, 31 aug 10, 15:23:26, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Obvious fail. The list is read only as the communication has to go trough the
BTS.
Not according to the description:
,[ http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/ ]
| Debian Technical Committee
| Public meeting, business and announcements of
Gerrit Pape writes (Re: dash Debian package - RC bugs):
I can't help, I don't understand. I yesterday followed up to a mail
that was additionally addressed to the debian-c...@lists.debian.org
mailing list and got an automatic reply telling me that the mail cannot
be delivered because I'm
[ It sucks to have to confirm mails for debian-package-d...@list.smarden.org ]
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
What happened to the idea of having /bin/sh - dash hardcoded in the dash
package instead ?
That's still the plan. The problem is that once dash is the only
package
On 28 April 2010 16:08, Gerrit Pape p...@smarden.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:20:12PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On 15 April 2010 12:58, Gerrit Pape p...@smarden.org wrote:
I tried to clone your git repository but it 404s, so I can't check
what other changes you've made so far and
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:24:32AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
[...]
A quick workaround to bypass the check, in case you want to upload
already, would be to: ddivert=dpkg; ddivert=${ddivert}-divert;
$ddivert --remove ...
[1] http://git.debian.org/?p=users/geissert/dash.git;a=summary
Why
Hi Ben,
On 29 April 2010 12:15, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:24:32AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
[...]
A quick workaround to bypass the check, in case you want to upload
already, would be to: ddivert=dpkg; ddivert=${ddivert}-divert;
$ddivert
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Any dpkg maintainer reading? Raphaël? Guillem?
Yes, but I don't know what you expect from me. That discussion dragged for
far too long in too many directions.
What happened to the idea of having /bin/sh - dash hardcoded in the dash
package instead ?
On 29 April 2010 14:23, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Any dpkg maintainer reading? Raphaël? Guillem?
Yes, but I don't know what you expect from me. That discussion dragged for
far too long in too many directions.
Hum, ok. That's why I
Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org writes:
That's still the plan. The problem is that once dash is the only package
shipping /bin/sh, bash would be the one prompting the user whether
she/he wants to use bash (so that the diversion is added) it would still
break in case the user already
On 15 April 2010 12:58, Gerrit Pape p...@smarden.org wrote:
Raphael sent a mail rudimentarily stating how to proceed. I must
confess, I don't really understand the plan, or why it should be done
this way. But I might miss information since I was not available when
the /bin/sh transition was
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:20:12PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On 15 April 2010 12:58, Gerrit Pape p...@smarden.org wrote:
Raphael sent a mail rudimentarily stating how to proceed. I must
confess, I don't really understand the plan, or why it should be done
this way. But I might miss
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:41:03PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
Why are you not using alioth for this?
It's less work for me, I haven't used alioth before.
Regards, Gerrit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 15/04/2010 19:58, Gerrit Pape wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:13:04PM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
I set up a mailing list to coordinate work on the dash package. If
you're interested in helping, please subscribe to the
debian-package-dash mailing list by sending an email to
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:59:45PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
On 15/04/2010 19:58, Gerrit Pape wrote:
Hi, unfortunately my email didn't attract many contributors, i.e. no one
but Raphael subscribed to the list.
Is there a way to look at the archive of your ML (the message of Raphael
in
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:13:04PM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
I set up a mailing list to coordinate work on the dash package. If
you're interested in helping, please subscribe to the
debian-package-dash mailing list by sending an email to
debian-package-dash-subscr...@list.smarden.org, and
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:13:04PM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
I'm looking for volunteers that are willing to help with maintaining
dash. Most of the work is relaying bug reports to upstream, judging and
including prospective fixes if upstream is unresponsive, preparing
patches for bugs, and
Raphael Geissert geissert at debian.org writes:
The shared debconf prompt idea was already discussed and discarded in one of
the d-devel threads
Ah, okay. Didn’t know that.
before the change was made. Which is what Thorsten's
idea was all about.
Well, I hope you’ve got some better idea
[Thorsten Glaser]
JFTR, Clint Adams and I have been working to get posh up to the task
of being a /bin/sh as well, so any solution should be able to not
only have GNU bash and dash and mksh as /bin/sh but also,
eventually, posh and ksh93 (if they add an “alias local=typeset”
builtin at
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
There’s still
• drop dash
• just manage the symlink, no diversions
The plan is to make dash the only package providing /bin/sh. bash and other
pet shells would then divert the symlink upon installation.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org -
Hi Gerrit,
Gerrit Pape wrote:
dash has outstanding RC bugs. Some are a left-over from the /bin/sh
transition from bash to dash, and still unresolved. IIRC Thorsten
Glaser had some ideas on how to proceed, but we never discussed anything
in this regard. Luk Claes and Raphael Geissert were
24 matches
Mail list logo
