Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and one a month old,
An upstream contributor promised to fix it and I'm waiting for a patch to
test the fix.
There is a workaround and the RC bug could be downgraded to important.
No. Having a workaround in the bug log is not something that
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
Hi,
The following packages are up for adoption:
* p0f
Hi,
I'd like to take this one.
Cheers,
Pierre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:15:01PM -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
The following packages are up for adoption:
* gawk
* mawk
* gawk-doc (non-free)
I would be willing to take these three.
Hi all,
those packages seem
Steve Langasek wrote:
arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
so those are for him.
Where by NMU you mean made an improper upload claiming to be the
maintainer of a package that was not up for adoption?
If he did not talk to James first, that is pretty bad and James
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:32:27PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
so those are for him.
Where by NMU you mean made an improper upload claiming to be the
maintainer of a package that was not up for adoption?
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following packages are up for adoption:
Please note I said adoption, not orphaned.
* gawk
* mawk
* gawk-doc (non-free)
Steve Langasek is taking these 3.
* quinn-diff
Luk Claes is taking this.
(Roger, I'm afraid I don't have a version
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 06:38:03PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
These 3 are still up for adoption:
* gnus
* gimp-dimage-color
* xloadimage
Is there any reason to keep xloadimage around? From what I can tell,
xli is a fork of it that saw some more development but both seem to be
dead in
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
* gdbm
* mawk
I'll would like to take gdbm mawk
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
James Troup wrote:
* quinn-diff
I would like to take this one.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, James Troup wrote:
* gnupg-doc
I'll take care of this one.
Don Armstrong
--
I leave the show floor, but not before a pack of caffeinated Jolt gum
is thrust at me by a hyperactive girl screaming, Chew more! Do more!
The American will to consume more and produce more
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:30:48AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
* gdbm
* mawk
I'll would like to take gdbm mawk
You currently have two RC bugs open on two base packages that you maintain,
one a year old and one a month
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:13:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
You currently have two RC bugs open on two base packages that you maintain,
one a year old
For that one, upstream didn't reply at all when asked about that issue
and one a month old,
An upstream contributor promised to fix it and
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:23:03AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:13:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
You currently have two RC bugs open on two base packages that you maintain,
one a year old
For that one, upstream didn't reply at all when asked about that
hello,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
The following packages are up for adoption:
* gawk
* gawk-doc (non-free)
arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
so those are for him.
thanks
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:41:20AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
James Troup wrote:
* quinn-diff
I would like to take this one.
Is this worth integrating with sbuild.git? Feel free to add it as part
of the buildd-tools project on Alioth in either case, since it's needed
by wanna-build.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
The following packages are up for adoption:
* gawk
* mawk
* gawk-doc (non-free)
I would be willing to take these three.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 01:42:12AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
The following packages are up for adoption:
* gawk
* gawk-doc (non-free)
arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
so those are for him.
David Watson wrote:
I'll take rss2email if no one else wants to.
Ok, you have it. Good luck!
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Serafeim.
archivemail
Anibal, funny as it may sound, would you mind letting archivemail to me? You
can still have the rest :) (or else just ignore this email)
Ok, go ahead.
archivemail is written on Python. I'm expert on C/C++.
I will
Hi Michael,
Michael Meskes wrote:
Sorry guys, apparently this email of mine didn't make it to the list.
Thus sending it again. Need to figure out what's going on as this
happened twice.
Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 20:53:51 schrieb Joey Hess:
I'll no longer be maintaining the following
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
rss2email
I'll take rss2email if no one else wants to.
--
David Watson - Debian GNU/Linux Developer
[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joey.
Im' very interested to adopt this packages:
archivemail
splitvt - I use it.
unclutter - I use it.
xaoom ? I think would be xzoom?
Regards.
- --
Anibal Avelar (FixXxeR) http://fixxxer.cc
GPG: 83B64656 - C143 4AD8 B017 53FA B742
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
aalib
I'll adopt aalib.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Michael Meskes wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 20:53:51 schrieb Joey Hess:
I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
...
acpi
I take this one. Hmm, thinking about it, I wonder if we
Anibal Avelar wrote:
Im' very interested to adopt this packages:
archivemail
splitvt - I use it.
unclutter - I use it.
xaoom ? I think would be xzoom?
Yes, xzoom.
Ok, please upload new versions with you as maintainer, and a few of
these have unreleased changes for debhelper v7 in
Bart Martens wrote:
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
aalib
I'll adopt aalib.
Both you and Anibal want this, so work something out.
--
see
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 13:36 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Bart Martens wrote:
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
aalib
I'll adopt aalib.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:59:55AM -0500, Anibal Avelar wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joey.
Im' very interested to adopt this packages:
archivemail
Anibal, funny as it may sound, would you mind letting
* Lars Wirzenius [Thu, 22 May 2008 07:59:26 +0300]:
Is acpi better than acpitool?
My love will go to whichever uses /sys first. (#462305 and #463111)
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at
Bart Martens wrote:
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 13:36 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Bart Martens wrote:
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
aalib
Sorry guys, apparently this email of mine didn't make it to the list.
Thus sending it again. Need to figure out what's going on as this
happened twice.
Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 20:53:51 schrieb Joey Hess:
I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
them next week and
to, 2008-05-22 kello 04:35 +0200, Michael Meskes kirjoitti:
Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 20:53:51 schrieb Joey Hess:
I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
...
acpi
I take this one. Hmm,
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:25:26PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
* flawfinder
* pscan
As I haven't gotten around to do too much audit work, I'll at least take
care of a few audit tools: flawfinder and pscan. It seems rats already
has a new maintainer...
Cheers, Uwe.
--
Uwe
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:52:41PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:25:26PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
* flawfinder
* pscan
As I haven't gotten around to do too much audit work, I'll at least take
care of a few audit tools: flawfinder and pscan. It
* Steve Kemp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :
I've recently orphaned all my packages whilst being on a
bit of hiatus from project work.
[...]
Several packages are still unclaimed, although people have
offered on some of them. Please take a look at the list if
you're interested:
[...]
*
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 21:25, Steve Kemp wrote:
I've recently orphaned all my packages whilst being on a
bit of hiatus from project work.
* driftnet
* dsniff
I'll take driftnet. What would a network admin do without it? ;)
I saw that Christian Kujau showed interest in dsniff
On 15:03 Sun 11 Dec 2005, George Wright wrote:
* on Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:21:28PM +1000, Bradley Marshall wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right process to follow, so please
let me know if there's something else I should be doing.
ditto for me - shall I fill in an ITA? I'm not a DD
* on Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:21:28PM +1000, Bradley Marshall wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right process to follow, so please
let me know if there's something else I should be doing.
ditto for me - shall I fill in an ITA? I'm not a DD and am unsure as to how to
proceed.
There's not
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:39:54PM +0100, Robert McQueen wrote:
Just a brief note to draw people's attention to the following RFAs
I filed a few days ago:
#193116 ap-utils -- Access Point SNMP Utils for Linux
#193117 igal -- online image gallery generator
#193118 tcpflow -- TCP flow
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:39:54PM +0100, Robert McQueen wrote:
Just a brief note to draw people's attention to the following RFAs
I filed a few days ago:
#193116 ap-utils -- Access Point SNMP Utils for Linux
#193117 igal -- online image gallery generator
#193118 tcpflow -- TCP flow
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 08:48:46AM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
I'd take tcpflow if it's not already been claimed, it nicely
comliments dsniff which I already have.
Steve
It's yours.
Regards,
Rob
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:51:40PM +0200, Celso González wrote:
I will like to adopt ap-utils, i??m using the 1.1 package but i have
a few problem that is resolved in the current 1.3 version
If you think I could to the job i will send the request to wnpp.
Best regards
Fine by me. As far
42 matches
Mail list logo
