On 03/25/2017 11:52 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 01:52:29AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 25.03.2017 um 01:17 schrieb gregor herrmann:
>>> On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 23:09:37 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
Installing debhelper (+dependencies) takes about 5s here (on a 6
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 11:52:31 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 23:09:37 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > >> Installing debhelper (+dependencies) takes about 5s here (on a 6 year
> > >> old laptop with SSD+eatmydata). Most of that time seems to be spent in
> > >> man-db's
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 01:52:29AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 25.03.2017 um 01:17 schrieb gregor herrmann:
> > On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 23:09:37 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> >> Installing debhelper (+dependencies) takes about 5s here (on a 6 year
> >> old laptop with SSD+eatmydata). Most of
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 01:52:29AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Installing debhelper (+dependencies) takes about 5s here (on a 6 year
> >> old laptop with SSD+eatmydata). Most of that time seems to be spent in
> >> man-db's postinst.
> >
> > For pbuilder/cowbuilder I'm using
> >
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:09:37PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 24.03.2017 um 13:46 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> > Hi!
> > Thought I'd share a trick I'm using: as debhelper's dependencies chain
> > became
> > really fat, you can gain a drastic speed-up (especially for small packages)
> > by
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:52:29 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Installing debhelper (+dependencies) takes about 5s here (on a 6 year
> >> old laptop with SSD+eatmydata). Most of that time seems to be spent in
> >> man-db's postinst.
> > For pbuilder/cowbuilder I'm using
> >
Am 25.03.2017 um 01:17 schrieb gregor herrmann:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 23:09:37 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Installing debhelper (+dependencies) takes about 5s here (on a 6 year
>> old laptop with SSD+eatmydata). Most of that time seems to be spent in
>> man-db's postinst.
>
> For
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 23:09:37 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Installing debhelper (+dependencies) takes about 5s here (on a 6 year
> old laptop with SSD+eatmydata). Most of that time seems to be spent in
> man-db's postinst.
For pbuilder/cowbuilder I'm using
Am 24.03.2017 um 23:09 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Installing debhelper (+dependencies) takes about 5s here (on a 6 year
> old laptop with SSD+eatmydata). Most of that time seems to be spent in
> man-db's postinst.
> # time apt install -y debhelper
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building
Am 24.03.2017 um 13:46 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> Hi!
> Thought I'd share a trick I'm using: as debhelper's dependencies chain became
> really fat, you can gain a drastic speed-up (especially for small packages)
> by preinstalling debhelper into your base sbuild/pbuilder/etc image.
Installing
Hi,
Quoting Timo Weingärtner (2017-03-24 16:56:51)
> These apt settings keep my systems clean and I guess they would also help
> build chroots:
>
> Apt::AutoRemove::RecommendsImportant "false";
> Apt::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant "false";
> Apt::Install-Recommends "false";
>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 04:18:10PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> No idea about official buildds, but I remember hearing somewhere that the
> Reproducible Builds project recreates them from scratch once a month.
The official buildds recreate their chroots twice a week.
Reproducible Builds buildds
2017-03-24 16:18:10 CET Adam Borowski:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 07:30:55PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:25:59PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > autoremove will still usually catch this.
> >
> > I'm not sure about this. Looks like it keeps Recommends or
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 04:18:10PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> The man page recommends -udcar, which includes autoclean, and, important
> here, autoremove.
I wonder why clean+autoclean (also both are only interesting when you keep
a separate /var/cache/apt/archives)
--
WBR, wRAR
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 07:30:55PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:25:59PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > autoremove will still usually catch this.
> I'm not sure about this. Looks like it keeps Recommends or something. Or
> it's a bug.
I'd say that apt autoremove
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:25:59PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> autoremove will still usually catch this.
I'm not sure about this. Looks like it keeps Recommends or something. Or
it's a bug.
> you do refresh your chroots from time to time (don't you?);
No, I didn't even think it's ever needed
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:49:52PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Thought I'd share a trick I'm using: as debhelper's dependencies chain
> > became
> > really fat, you can gain a drastic speed-up (especially for small
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Thought I'd share a trick I'm using: as debhelper's dependencies chain became
> really fat, you can gain a drastic speed-up (especially for small packages)
> by preinstalling debhelper into your base sbuild/pbuilder/etc image.
What
18 matches
Mail list logo
