On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 10:56:37PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
On Saturday 02 June 2007 21:45, Russ Allbery wrote:
Take a look at runit. ?It's quite a bit like daemontools without the weird
licensing.
Runit doesn't appear to be useful for non-system tasks, like starting jackd
and
On Sunday 03 June 2007 15:11:36 Vincent Danjean wrote:
To be run by a user, you can look at launchtool (in the package with
the same name).
Description: Runs a command supervising its execution
Runs a user-supplied command supervising its execution in
many ways:
[...]
This looks like it
Warren Turkal wrote:
On Saturday 02 June 2007 21:45, Russ Allbery wrote:
Take a look at runit. It's quite a bit like daemontools without the weird
licensing.
Runit doesn't appear to be useful for non-system tasks, like starting jackd
and restarting it if it dies (i.e. on suspend/resume).
Warren Turkal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there anything like daemontools in main? I would like it to work with
user processes. I would like to use it to make sure a user process stays
running while I am logged in. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Take a look at runit. It's quite a bit
On Saturday 02 June 2007 21:45, Russ Allbery wrote:
Take a look at runit. It's quite a bit like daemontools without the weird
licensing.
Runit doesn't appear to be useful for non-system tasks, like starting jackd
and restarting it if it dies (i.e. on suspend/resume).
wt
--
Warren Turkal
Warren Turkal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 02 June 2007 21:45, Russ Allbery wrote:
Take a look at runit. It's quite a bit like daemontools without the
weird licensing.
Runit doesn't appear to be useful for non-system tasks, like starting
jackd and restarting it if it dies (i.e. on
On Saturday 02 June 2007 23:03, Russ Allbery wrote:
Could you say more about why not? It looked to me like you could use its
supervise equivalent without the whole init replacement stuff.
I took a closer look. It looked like the runit wanted to replace init
entirely. I don't see how to
Warren Turkal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 02 June 2007 23:03, Russ Allbery wrote:
Could you say more about why not? It looked to me like you could use
its supervise equivalent without the whole init replacement stuff.
I took a closer look. It looked like the runit wanted to
8 matches
Mail list logo
