On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:04:14PM +, Noah Slater wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:50:22PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:26:03PM +, Noah Slater wrote:
How should we go about collecting to the contributers? Should I post
a note to the wiki (alerting
On Wed, Dec 03 2008, Noah Slater wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 10:52:39AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Why do you need a separate mailing list for a single proposal? Please
discuss this on debian-devel or debian-project, which are already perfectly
adequate lists for this.
We have
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:16:44PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Except that debtags are right now for binary packages, whereas
copyright is for source packages.
Err, not quite right:
Policy 4.5:
Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright and
distribution
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The solution to your problem already exists (actually, it has been
*designed* for that): http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
, it just needs someone with the energy of finalizing the proposal
(most likely via a DEP), so that is stops
Hey,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:25:20PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The solution to your problem already exists (actually, it has been
*designed* for that): http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
, it just needs someone with the
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:49:25AM +, Noah Slater wrote:
To get this started we need a mailing list and a repository, then we
can place a notice on the wiki directing people to the mailing list
and make the wiki page immutable so that there is no confusion.
Come on, do you really need all
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:05:56PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:49:25AM +, Noah Slater wrote:
To get this started we need a mailing list and a repository, then we
can place a notice on the wiki directing people to the mailing list
and make the wiki page
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:46:29PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:30:54PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
We should somehow tag those conflictive licenses with debtags, so that
users can filter out the ones they don't wont easily. I don't object
[...]
Except that
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:18:35PM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
The wish for encoding licenses in debtags categories periodically shows
up, so I collected some pointers to old discussions in the FAQ:
Noah Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:25:20PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The solution to your problem already exists (actually, it has been
*designed* for that):
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:26:03PM +, Noah Slater wrote:
How should we go about collecting to the contributers? Should I post
a note to the wiki (alerting the subscribers) about this, and if so,
where to direct people for collaboration?
It is up to you. From a management point of view, I
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:57:33PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
As one of the primary contributers to the copyright proposal I would
obviously like to be involved in its ratification. I am guessing some of the
other main contributers would like to be involved too.
Great, then maybe
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:50:22PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:26:03PM +, Noah Slater wrote:
How should we go about collecting to the contributers? Should I post
a note to the wiki (alerting the subscribers) about this, and if so,
where to direct people
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:49:25AM +, Noah Slater wrote:
As one of the primary contributers to the copyright proposal I would obviously
like to be involved in its ratification. I am guessing some of the other main
contributers would like to be involved too.
To get this started we need a
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 10:52:39AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:49:25AM +, Noah Slater wrote:
As one of the primary contributers to the copyright proposal I would
obviously
like to be involved in its ratification. I am guessing some of the other
main
Le Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 08:52:17PM +, Noah Slater a écrit :
We have struggled enough with the proposal as it is. My fear is that
discussing
it on debian-devel will open it up to fire-and-forget criticism that lacks
context of previous discussions, is poorly thought out, results in
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 09:50:15AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Rendez-vous after Lenny release on -devel :)
Heh heh. Sure thing, Charles.
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
2008/12/2 Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ M-F-T set to -devel ]
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:30:54PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
We should somehow tag those conflictive licenses with debtags, so that
users can filter out the ones they don't wont easily. I don't object
Except that
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:51:04PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
2008/12/2 Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ M-F-T set to -devel ]
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:30:54PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
We should somehow tag those conflictive licenses with debtags, so that
users can filter out
Quoth Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 2008-12-02 21:51:04 +0100:
Well, not exactly, you cannot easily see the copyright file before
installing the package, can you?
p.d.o appears to permit viewing copyright files of packages currently
in the archive. As an example:
2008/12/2 Drake Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoth Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 2008-12-02 21:51:04 +0100:
Well, not exactly, you cannot easily see the copyright file before
installing the package, can you?
p.d.o appears to permit viewing copyright files of packages currently
in the
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 22:36:15 +0100
Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/12/2 Drake Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoth Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 2008-12-02 21:51:04 +0100:
Well, not exactly, you cannot easily see the copyright file before
installing the package, can you?
p.d.o
2008/12/2 Karl Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Would something like apt-listbugs work? I know it doesnt address the
offline issue, but seems to fit as a concept for the rest of the
problem.
Yep, that should be enough, as long as there is a way (with some
possible development in the future) for a
Miriam Ruiz dijo [Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:51:04PM +0100]:
The solution to your problem already exists (actually, it has been
*designed* for that): http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
, it just needs someone with the energy of finalizing the proposal
(most likely via a DEP), so
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
2008/12/2 Karl Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Would something like apt-listbugs work? I know it doesnt address the
offline issue, but seems to fit as a concept for the rest of the
problem.
Yep, that should be enough, as long as there is a way (with some
possible development
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[...]
Except that debtags are right now for binary packages, whereas
copyright is for source packages.
Err, not quite right:
Policy 4.5:
Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright and
distribution license in the file
26 matches
Mail list logo
