On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 22:09 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 17:47 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Svante Signell writes (Re: xpdf removed from testing?):
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:59 +, Neil Williams wrote:
That's 7 entirely sufficient reasons and one problem
On 15/01/14 21:09, Svante Signell wrote:
I cleaned out the duplicated code between xpdf and poppler (which is a
continuation of xpdf becoming a PDF rendering library). Some more
cleaning is still needed, to actually remove all irrelevant code (and
update relevant code). Is it possible to
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 17:47 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Svante Signell writes (Re: xpdf removed from testing?):
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:59 +, Neil Williams wrote:
That's 7 entirely sufficient reasons and one problem that arguably makes
fixing the other seven harder. So 7.5 reasons
On Jan 13, Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear. I like that program very
much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs, a dead upstream?
Do you need more reasons?
Maybe this question should go to debian-release instead?
Maybe you
On 01/13/2014 05:38 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear. I like that program very
much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs, a dead upstream?
The 7 RC bugs are the exact reason:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xpdf/news/20131208T163914Z.html
This
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:38:21 +0100
Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear.
No, it will be removed from testing. That means that new users won't
have it available but anyone who already has it installed is welcome
to it, with all it's
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:59 +, Neil Williams wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:38:21 +0100
Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote:
I like that program very
much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs, a dead
upstream?
That's 7 entirely sufficient reasons and one
Hi Svante,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:19:21PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:59 +, Neil Williams wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:38:21 +0100
Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote:
I like that program very
much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7
Svante Signell writes (Re: xpdf removed from testing?):
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:59 +, Neil Williams wrote:
That's 7 entirely sufficient reasons and one problem that arguably makes
fixing the other seven harder. So 7.5 reasons to remove it from testing.
OK; OK, I understand completely
previously on this list Svante Signell contributed:
Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear. I like that program very
much.
I like it too but it's save dialog is pretty terrible. Have you checked
out mupdf. No save but similar otherwise.
p.s. qpdfview is shaping up and remembers tabs too.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:19:21 +0100
Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 16:59 +, Neil Williams wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:38:21 +0100
Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote:
I like that program very
much. For which reasons, in addition to
* Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com, 2014-01-13, 17:38:
Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear. I like that program very
much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs,
For very small values of 7. :-)
a dead upstream?
The last xpdf release was in 2011, the previous one in
Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com writes:
OK; OK, I understand completely. As a follow-up: according to popcon
there are about 10 000 installations of that package. Any
interest/chance that patches will help re-introduce this package, or is
it just a waste of effort? What is the opinion
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 19:25 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com, 2014-01-13, 17:38:
Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear. I like that program very
much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs,
For very small values of 7. :-)
There are seven,
Is it true that xpdf is about to disappear. I like that program very
much. For which reasons, in addition to the 7 RC bugs, a dead upstream?
Do you need more reasons?
Actually *1* RC bug that was introduced by replacing the proper xpdf
code with linking to poppler - a moving target that
Le mardi 14 janvier 2014 à 07:16 +0900, Norbert Preining a écrit :
Yes, xpdf works very well. THose people having problem should simple
compile a version from upstream without the pesty Debian changes to
link against poppler, and it will work again.
And as a bonus, the PDF exploits will work
16 matches
Mail list logo
