On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:05:40PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > | /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-base.postinst
> You should do this carefully:
> if [ -n "$PS1" ]; then
> # set whatever interactive things you want
> fi
Why is the shell invoked by dpkg executing the .bashrc in the first place?
Fi
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 12:33:23PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> Nils wrote in his bug report:
>
> ,
> | The postinst script:
> | /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-base.postinst
> | fails if you set bash's "noclobber" (say in your .bashrc via set -o
> noclobber).
> | (yes, I set noclobber in root's .b
Hi Nils, hi all
(remember to take -devel out if applicable, I'm getting the mail through
the bug address),
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:18:09AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>>
>> But if I start apt-get upgrade or whatever from my interactive shell
>> wit
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:18:09AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:02:00PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> but I
> >> see no reason, neither in Policy nor in "common sense", why root
> >> shouldn't use it. On the other hand, t
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:02:00PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> but I
>> see no reason, neither in Policy nor in "common sense", why root
>> shouldn't use it. On the other hand, this usage of mktemp has been
>> the result of discussions on [EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:19:35PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:02:00PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > in bug #275140, I was made aware of a problem with the handling of
> > tempfiles in tetex's maintainer scripts, and it seems to be a general
> > problem.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:02:00PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in bug #275140, I was made aware of a problem with the handling of
> tempfiles in tetex's maintainer scripts, and it seems to be a general
> problem. Basically, we do
>
> tempfile=`mktemp`
> echo something > $tempfile
>
> an
Hi,
in bug #275140, I was made aware of a problem with the handling of
tempfiles in tetex's maintainer scripts, and it seems to be a general
problem. Basically, we do
tempfile=`mktemp`
echo something > $tempfile
and this will fail if the noclobber option is set in the executing
shell, because af
8 matches
Mail list logo