On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:16:58AM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote on
debian-med list[1] but the discussion should be here on debian-devel
(Reply-To is set):
Once we are at the topic of web tools: I'm really waiting for an answer
from you why you think that mgltools fit in your categories
Gunnar Wolf schrieb:
James Westby dijo [Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:44:49AM +0100]:
I see it as an almost bi-directional relationship, but one that allows
you to add it to the package that cares about it more.
I agree with your analysis. But, if this is the case, the treatment
should be
Sven Mueller schrieb:
Comming back to icedove, an example would be the calendar plugin (which
is not in Debian as far as I know).
You're thinking of iceowl-extension I guess? Using it here and it's
definitely in Debian ;)
Regards,
Sven
Christoph
--
/\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID:
Andreas Tille wrote:
I even failed to grep man apt-get for the string suggests so
I think I can not do something like
apt-get --include-suggest install
-o 'Apt::Install-Suggests=1'
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:35:10AM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
apt-get --include-suggest install
-o 'Apt::Install-Suggests=1'
Ahh, I remember I was formerly wondering about this option which might
be not easy enough to find. But anyway, my main question was whether
there is a
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:35:10AM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
apt-get --include-suggest install
-o 'Apt::Install-Suggests=1'
Ahh, I remember I was formerly wondering about this option which might
be not easy enough to find. But anyway, my main question was
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Ahh, I remember I was formerly wondering about this option which might
be not easy enough to find. But anyway, my main question was whether
there is a technical implementation of the *Enhances* field.
Personally, I'd would never set even
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:26:24AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
How do you imagine a technical implementation of a 'Enhances' field?
Something
like 'apt::install-enhances'?
I do not *want* this personally - I just wanted to know if any tool
makes use of this field in some way.
The
James Westby dijo [Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:44:49AM +0100]:
Yet a package of a plugin should surely have a ‘Depends’ relationship to
the application package. Adding an ‘Enhances’ relationship seems
redundant in that case.
No, there are plenty of packages which depend on another without
Hi,
in the Debian Pure Blends effort we were wondering about relations of packages
and what an Enhances relation actually means. Debian Policy says:
`Enhances'
This field is similar to Suggests but works in the opposite
direction. It is used to declare that a package
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:13:42PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
What exactly means similar. Assume package foo enhances package bar.
Does this mean that in turn package bar should Suggest package foo or
is this conclusion not really valid?
As I understand it, A enhances B has (more or less)
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:36 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:13:42PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
What exactly means similar. Assume package foo enhances package bar.
Does this mean that in turn package bar should Suggest package foo or
is this conclusion not
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:36 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
As I understand it, A enhances B has (more or less) the same
effect as B suggests A. Thus, the reverse Suggests relation would
be redundant.
A plugin enhances the application it
Ben Finney wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:36 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
As I understand it, A enhances B has (more or less) the same
effect as B suggests A. Thus, the reverse Suggests relation would
be redundant.
A plugin enhances the
James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net writes:
Ben Finney wrote:
Yet a package of a plugin should surely have a ‘Depends’
relationship to the application package. Adding an ‘Enhances’
relationship seems redundant in that case.
No, there are plenty of packages which depend on another
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:44:49AM +0100, James Westby wrote:
I see it as an almost bi-directional relationship, but one that allows
you to add it to the package that cares about it more.
So the answers somehow draw a sketch about the concept behind the
Enhances field - but is it technically
16 matches
Mail list logo
