Re: Release-critical Bugreport for May 14, 2004

2004-10-26 Thread Pascal Hakim
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 02:52:34PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Cord Beermann: > > > I added a temporary(?) fix, and bounced the latest report to the list. > > Thanks, but it ended up in the archive (under the URL > ), > but

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for May 14, 2004

2004-10-25 Thread Florian Weimer
* Cord Beermann: > I added a temporary(?) fix, and bounced the latest report to the list. Thanks, but it ended up in the archive (under the URL ), but not in the inboxes of subscribers.

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for May 14, 2004

2004-10-24 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Colin Watson) hast geschrieben: >As far as I can tell, the reports are still being mailed as normal. >Perhaps a listmaster could investigate why they're not reaching the >debian-devel-announce readership. a lot of funny spamassassin-hits pushed the report to junk. I added a temporary(

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for May 14, 2004

2004-10-24 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
El dom, 24-10-2004 a las 09:14 +0200, Andreas Tille escribiÃ: > On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > > Did these reports stop, or is there something wrong with my email? > > The last one I could find in my debian-devel-announce mail folder is > > from 2004-05-14. > This is what I wo

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for May 14, 2004

2004-10-24 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:08:32AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > As far as I can tell, the reports are still being mailed as normal. > Perhaps a listmaster could investigate why they're not reaching the > debian-devel-announce readership. Perhaps they hit the maximum message size or something? /*

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for May 14, 2004

2004-10-24 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 12:34:54PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > They are; I received one just last week. > > If they're not reaching you, I suggest you check your d-d-a subscription > and/or your spam filter. How did you receive a mail to d-d-a which is not even in the archive ? http://lists.d

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for May 14, 2004

2004-10-24 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 12:34:54PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:08:32AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 01:26:09AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > > [BugScan reporter] > > > > Bug stamp-out list for May 14 06:01 (CST) > > > > > > > > Total

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for May 14, 2004

2004-10-24 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:08:32AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 01:26:09AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > [BugScan reporter] > > > Bug stamp-out list for May 14 06:01 (CST) > > > > > > Total number of release-critical bugs: 565 > > > Number that will disappear after r

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for May 14, 2004

2004-10-24 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 01:26:09AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [BugScan reporter] > > Bug stamp-out list for May 14 06:01 (CST) > > > > Total number of release-critical bugs: 565 > > Number that will disappear after removing packages marked [REMOVE]: 1 > > Number that have a patch: 79 > > N

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for May 14, 2004

2004-10-24 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Did these reports stop, or is there something wrong with my email? The last one I could find in my debian-devel-announce mail folder is from 2004-05-14. This is what I wondered every week but was to lazy to ask. Either something is broken or our both

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for May 14, 2004

2004-10-23 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[BugScan reporter] > Bug stamp-out list for May 14 06:01 (CST) > > Total number of release-critical bugs: 565 > Number that will disappear after removing packages marked [REMOVE]: 1 > Number that have a patch: 79 > Number that have a fix prepared and waiting to upload: 22 > Number that are being i