On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:36:38AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist dijo [Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:19:45PM +0100]:
> > > And would a larger discussion at debconf'05 not have been more appropriate
> > > than handing done a couple of taken decision disguised as proposal ?
> > >
> > > It is
Ola Lundqvist dijo [Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:19:45PM +0100]:
> > And would a larger discussion at debconf'05 not have been more appropriate
> > than handing done a couple of taken decision disguised as proposal ?
> >
> > It is not too late for this yet, but there needs to be a real discussion
> >
Hello
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:43:11AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 05:32:44PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Frank Küster wrote:
> > > I do not understand why the Nybbles team mixed their good news about
> > > sarge with their foreseeably controversial plans or proposal for
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> It has absolutely nothing to do with what has been discussed
> previously. The authors are the same who said repeteadly that the
> number of architectures wasn't reponsible for the sarge delay.
The above statement is incorrect. If you disagree, you'll need to pull
up referen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, the architecture handling is controversial. Fine...this will
> probably delay etch more than we would like. But could we please focus
> on releasing sarge first? By focus, I also mean avoidn wasting
>
> I do not understand why the Nybbles team mixed their good news about
> sarge with their foreseeably controversial plans or proposal for etch.
This may have been a strategical error, yes.
For me, the Vancouver meeting goal was obviously the sarge release and
IMHO, they achieved their goal very
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 05:32:44PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
> > I do not understand why the Nybbles team mixed their good news about
> > sarge with their foreseeably controversial plans or proposal for etch.
> > I fear that we will have a huge, long flamewar. And many competen
Frank Küster wrote:
> I do not understand why the Nybbles team mixed their good news about
> sarge with their foreseeably controversial plans or proposal for etch.
> I fear that we will have a huge, long flamewar. And many competent,
> active people will start coding implementations of alternative
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...but quite sad (or happy?) to see that nearly only the proposal to handle
> architectures differently got criticism...while this proposal contains
> several other key point.
I do not understand why the Nybbles team mixed their good news about
sarge
9 matches
Mail list logo
