[Redirecting to debian-lts list, for real]
On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 08:54 +, Michael Firth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It would be useful if there were information somewhere on the
> following for Debian Jessie LTS architectures:
>
>
> 1. What should we be using as our source.list file?
The same as b
[Redirecting to debian-lts list]
On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 08:54 +, Michael Firth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It would be useful if there were information somewhere on the
> following for Debian Jessie LTS architectures:
>
>
> 1. What should we be using as our source.list file?
The same as before, min
Hi,
It would be useful if there were information somewhere on the following for
Debian Jessie LTS architectures:
1. What should we be using as our source.list file?
2. Which of the jessie repositories that existed until mid-March have now
gone? (from a release that is supposed to still h
Le 28/03/2019 à 19:18, Raphaël Halimi a écrit :
> Le 20/03/2019 à 21:50, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
>> The data is, of course, not lost - the whole of it is synced
>> to archive.debian.org, so if you still need it you will be able to get
>> it from there.[1]
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the directorie
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:43:46 +0100
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Except for the LTS part of jessie, none of wheezy/jessie should be used
> anymore, its out of security support.
Yes, but most of users doesn't understand it properly and they were just
confused with it. And it seems that such users
Le 20/03/2019 à 21:50, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
> The data is, of course, not lost - the whole of it is synced
> to archive.debian.org, so if you still need it you will be able to get
> it from there.[1]
Hi,
I noticed that the directories containing the netboot installer images
(debian/dists//main
Am 28.03.19 um 17:48 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
[...]
> The thing is, backports are *not* part of the LTS effort. Users having
> the jessie-backports repository in a production environment when it is
> not supported anymore is unexpected and unwanted.
>
> IMO, the only issue is not warning in advanc
On 3/26/19 11:45 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 26.03.19 um 10:43 schrieb Joerg Jaspert:
>> On 15353 March 1977, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>>
The data is, of course, not lost - the whole of it is synced
to archive.debian.org, so if you still need it you will be able to get
it from there.
Am 26.03.19 um 10:43 schrieb Joerg Jaspert:
> On 15353 March 1977, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>
>>> The data is, of course, not lost - the whole of it is synced
>>> to archive.debian.org, so if you still need it you will be able to get
>>> it from there.[1]
>> Some vendors asks their users to use archi
On 15353 March 1977, Hideki Yamane wrote:
The data is, of course, not lost - the whole of it is synced
to archive.debian.org, so if you still need it you will be able to get
it from there.[1]
Some vendors asks their users to use archive.d.o but maybe archive.d.o
doesn't have enough resource t
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 21:50:35 +0100
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> The data is, of course, not lost - the whole of it is synced
> to archive.debian.org, so if you still need it you will be able to get
> it from there.[1]
Some vendors asks their users to use archive.d.o but maybe archive.d.o
doesn't
On 15348 March 1977, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
It would be great if the last state of LTS, ideally with a signature
that does not expire for a couple of years¹, were available from
archive.d.o as well.
Right. I am going to import the wheezy lts foo later into
archive.debian.org (into the security
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > Were the wheezy/updates and wheezy-updates merged into just wheezy
> > > as last step before archiving, so that those two lines can just be
> > > dropped?
> >
> > Yes, it is common that the last point release, just at end of life time,
> > takes in
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 08:56:58AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 15347 March 1977, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> > deb http://archive.debian.org/debian wheezy main
> > deb http://archive.debian.org/debian-security wheezy/updates main
> > deb http://archive.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main
> >
On 15347 March 1977, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian wheezy main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian-security wheezy/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian wheezy-backports main
… out of which the se
Joerg Jaspert dixit:
> as Wheezy and Jessie have been integrated into the archive.debian.org
> structure recently, we are now removing all of Wheezy and all non-LTS
Which sources.list changes are necessary?
My starting point is this:
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian wheezy main
deb http:/
16 matches
Mail list logo
