On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Erik Johansson wrote:
> Did you get any reply Paul?
One of the people said they were not interested in licq any more.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Any more comments on this, or should I go ahead and file a bug?
Did you get any reply Paul?
// Erik
On 5 Apr 2016 6:41 pm, "Erik Johansson" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planing on asking for Licq (multi-protocol instant messaging client)
> to be removed from Debian unstable due to it being unmaintained
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Erik Johansson wrote:
> I'm planing on asking for Licq (multi-protocol instant messaging client) to
> be removed from Debian unstable due to it being unmaintained upstream and
> now FTBFS. Since it is a network application it feels bad from a security
> POV to keep
Hi,
I'm planing on asking for Licq (multi-protocol instant messaging client) to
be removed from Debian unstable due to it being unmaintained upstream and
now FTBFS. Since it is a network application it feels bad from a security
POV to keep it.
Does this sound right or is there any other opinion?
4 matches
Mail list logo
