On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 12:29 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Cyril Brulebois:
I'm wondering whether the ArchitectureSpecificsMemo[1] wiki page is
(well-)known, and whether its content got reviewed, esp. by porters of
each architecture, who could fix obvious errors or typos, or eventually
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 00:15 -0400, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I looked at the page: this seems like an appropriate moment to mention
something that should be a lot more widely known than it is:
sizeof(char) == 1
sizeof(signed char) == 1
sizeof(unsigned char) == 1
Those three
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
sizeof(char) == 1
I just removed them for this reason.
Maybe we need to specify CHAR_BITS instead?
Gruss
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 20:21 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
sizeof(char) == 1
I just removed them for this reason.
Maybe we need to specify CHAR_BITS instead?
Maybe some day Debian will run on an architecture where CHAR_BITS != 8,
but I doubt it;
* Bernd Eckenfels:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
sizeof(char) == 1
I just removed them for this reason.
Maybe we need to specify CHAR_BITS instead?
Too much Java programming? 8-)
POSIX requires CHAR_BITS to be 8 these days.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm wondering whether the ArchitectureSpecificsMemo[1] wiki page is
(well-)known, and whether its content got reviewed, esp. by porters of
each architecture, who could fix obvious errors or typos, or eventually
add special-cases, exceptions, and the like.
1.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 08:12:58AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering whether the ArchitectureSpecificsMemo[1] wiki page is
(well-)known, and whether its content got reviewed, esp. by porters of
each architecture, who could fix obvious errors or typos, or eventually
add
[Cyril Brulebois]
Hi,
I'm wondering whether the ArchitectureSpecificsMemo[1] wiki page is
(well-)known, and whether its content got reviewed, esp. by porters of
each architecture, who could fix obvious errors or typos, or eventually
add special-cases, exceptions, and the like.
1.
I looked at the page: this seems like an appropriate moment to mention
something that should be a lot more widely known than it is:
sizeof(char) == 1
sizeof(signed char) == 1
sizeof(unsigned char) == 1
Those three equalities are not part of any ABI. They are written into
the C
9 matches
Mail list logo
