On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 10:33:58PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Don Armstrong
| The maintainer is primarily responsible for the severity levels of the
| bugs in their package. Basically, the only exception[1] to this are
| the RMs, who may decide that a bug needs to be above or below the
* Don Armstrong
| The maintainer is primarily responsible for the severity levels of the
| bugs in their package. Basically, the only exception[1] to this are
| the RMs, who may decide that a bug needs to be above or below the RC
| threshold.[2]
Actually, they can say a bug is RC even if it's
Scribit Steve Langasek dies 04/04/2005 hora 00:42:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=300765msg=14
He has the approval of the release team.
I didn't notice this mail in the time I was discussing with the
maintainer. And it lacks explanation. When I read it recently, I thought
it
Scribit Don Armstrong dies 04/04/2005 hora 01:09:
Otherwise, all you're doing is abusing the BTS, no matter how correct
your actual appraisal of the severity bug is.
Downgrading a bug that is a clear violation of the policy just to have a
package in the next stable release IS abusing the BTS.
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
Scribit Don Armstrong dies 04/04/2005 hora 01:09:
Otherwise, all you're doing is abusing the BTS, no matter how correct
your actual appraisal of the severity bug is.
Downgrading a bug that is a clear violation of the policy just to
have a package
I have a problem with a bug filed on r-doc-html (#300765). The
documentation was entirely in /usr/lib, and it seems that all R packages
have all their files under /usr/lib, whatever their type or purpose.
I filed a bug with severity serious, as this breaks Policy 9.1.1 (FHS is
mandatory). But the
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 09:28:22AM +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
I have a problem with a bug filed on r-doc-html (#300765). The
documentation was entirely in /usr/lib, and it seems that all R packages
have all their files under /usr/lib, whatever their type or purpose.
I filed a bug with
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
I filed a bug with severity serious, as this breaks Policy 9.1.1
(FHS is mandatory). But the maintainer argued that R was packaged
like this from the beginning, and that because it must stay in the
distribution, the bug had to be downgraded to
Hi Pierre,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 09:28:22AM +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
I have a problem with a bug filed on r-doc-html (#300765). The
documentation was entirely in /usr/lib, and it seems that all R packages
have all their files under /usr/lib, whatever their type or purpose.
How is that
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 11:53 +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
For invidual files
this is too much work though - it could work for directories.
Why would it be hard with individual files? Just use a shell fragment
like:
FILES=foo bar baz
for i in $FILES
do
mv $DESTDIR/usr/lib/$i
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:13:36PM -0400, David Mandelberg wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 11:53 +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
For invidual files
this is too much work though - it could work for directories.
Why would it be hard with individual files? Just use a shell fragment
like:
11 matches
Mail list logo
