://github.com/itgalaxy/webfont
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Javascript (Node.js)
Description : Generate icon fonts from SVG icons
Webfont converts sets of SVG files into an icon font, in any of the
formats: woff2, woff, eot, ttf and svg. These can then be used
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 14:24:41 +0100
Source: emelfm2-svg-icons
Architecture: source
Version: 20100219-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Jelmer Vernooij
Changes:
emelfm2-svg-icons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 18:59:16 -0300
Source: emelfm2-svg-icons
Architecture: source
Version: 20100219-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Marcos Talau
Changes:
emelfm2-svg-icons (20100219
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 03:32:30 +0100
Source: emelfm2-svg-icons
Binary: emelfm2-svg-icons
Architecture: source all
Version: 20100219-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Jelmer Vernooij
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 00:49:44 -0300
Source: emelfm2-svg-icons
Architecture: source
Version: 20100219-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
Changes:
emelfm2-svg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 17:58:56 -0300
Source: emelfm2-svg-icons
Architecture: source
Version: 20100219-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
Changes:
emelfm2-svg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 15:03:37 -0300
Source: emelfm2-svg-icons
Architecture: source
Version: 20100219-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
Changes:
emelfm2-svg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:55:21 +0200
Source: emelfm2-svg-icons
Binary: emelfm2-svg-icons
Architecture: source all
Version: 20100219-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
Changed-By: Jari
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:35:26 -0500
Source: emelfm2-svg-icons
Binary: emelfm2-svg-icons
Architecture: source all
Version: 20100219-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
Changed-By: Jari Aalto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:14:58 +0200
Source: emelfm2-svg-icons
Binary: emelfm2-svg-icons
Architecture: source all
Version: 20100219-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
Changed-By: Jari Aalto
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:16:06PM -0600, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that's a may and a should, not a must. IIRC they only trigger
lintian warnings, not errors.
If I tell my son, You may not go play in the rain., he knows
that he can't go play in the rain.
OT
If you tell
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 15:49 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:16:06PM -0600, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Note that's a may and a should, not a must. IIRC they only trigger
lintian warnings, not errors.
If I tell my son, You may not go play in the rain., he
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:56:23AM -0600, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See RFC 2119. I think usages of may, should, must and stuff should
follow these explanations.
There's an RFC for words???
Yes, there is one, to make sure everybody use the words for the same
thing, especially
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 11:55:41AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:49:49PM +0100, Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The authoritative document is the menu _manual_:
(/usr/share/doc/menu/menu.txt.gz), section 3.7
An extract from that section:
Debian
Ron Johnson wrote:
See RFC 2119. I think usages of may, should, must and stuff should
follow these explanations.
Note that RFC 2119 does not mention the phrase may not. In American
english it clearly means is not permitted. For clarity in policy
documents must not should be used when the
Le mardi 07 dcembre 2004 23:51 -0500, James A. Treacy a crit :
SVG use is increasing and I have seen nothing in Debian about how they
should be handled. So,
I don't think that's much different from PNG icons.
What is the proper way to handle svg icons?
For example, where should
don't think that's much different from PNG icons.
What is the proper way to handle svg icons?
For example, where should they be placed?
GNOME places them under /usr/share/icons/$THEME/scalable.
How well are they supported?
Support is increasing; but at least all GTK+ stuff supports them
Eric Lavarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed, Dec 08, 2004:
To summarize, I think recommending SVG would require a change to the policy.
It's defined in the _Menu_ Policy. I think the people maintaining the
Debian menu system are best placed to tell what should be allowed or
not.
Additionally,
are best placed to tell what should be allowed or
not.
It is precisely because the menu policy does not say anything about
icons that I brought this up here. 'man menufile' states that an icon
can be specified but nothing else.
Note that svg icons work in a gnome environment. Because gramps is
a gnome
:
Debian package maintainers should ensure that any icons they include
for use in the Debian menus conform to the following points:
1. The icons should be in xpm format.
2. The icons may not be larger than 32x32 pixels, although smaller
sizes are ok.
Note that svg icons
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:49:49PM +0100, Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The authoritative document is the menu _manual_:
(/usr/share/doc/menu/menu.txt.gz), section 3.7
An extract from that section:
Debian package maintainers should ensure that any icons they include
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 11:55 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:49:49PM +0100, Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The authoritative document is the menu _manual_:
(/usr/share/doc/menu/menu.txt.gz), section 3.7
An extract from that section:
Debian package
SVG use is increasing and I have seen nothing in Debian about how they
should be handled. So,
What is the proper way to handle svg icons?
For example, where should they be placed?
How well are they supported?
Should a non-svg icon also be included?
--
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
23 matches
Mail list logo
