On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:05:03PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
the matter has been discussed at least twice already. Roberto C. Sanchez
brought the matter back up in January 2008.
On d-d? I can't find that thread in the list archives...
I would like to raise the issue of licensing. Is a
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 02:40:20PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:05:03PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
the matter has been discussed at least twice already. Roberto C. Sanchez
brought the matter back up in January 2008.
On d-d? I can't find that thread in the list
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Jon Dowland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to raise the issue of licensing.
This is being looked into by SPI's legal counsel. I'll be sure to
forward the findings to the games-thumbnails bug and debian-legal.
--
bye,
pabs
Michael Banck wrote:
Also, we should probably include window decorations to not make the
screenshot look funny
I don't buy that a screenshot without window decorations somehow looks
funny. However, if an implementation wants to, it can decorate a
screenshot at display time with whatever
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:24:44PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
Before people submit dozens of screenshots all looking slightly
different, I suggest first deciding on some standards, like making sure
screenshots use the default GTK or Qt theme Debian uses.
Back when I was involved in the
Quoth Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 2008-07-23 12:45:03 -0400:
I don't buy that a screenshot without window decorations somehow
looks funny.
One data point: a screenshot with no window decorations loses a small
amount of information, primarily the caption used for the window.
Interesting ways
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:53:14AM -0500, Drake Wilson wrote:
One data point: a screenshot with no window decorations loses a small
amount of information, primarily the caption used for the window.
Interesting ways of working around this might involve storing the
caption as metadata, or
Quoth Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 2008-07-24 00:33:01 +0200:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:53:14AM -0500, Drake Wilson wrote:
One data point: a screenshot with no window decorations loses a small
amount of information, primarily the caption used for the window.
Interesting ways of
Drake Wilson wrote:
Well, there's a difference between one application is one window and
one screenshot is one window; if you have multiple windows in a
single screenshot then you have to have the decorations so that you
can tell them apart, so none of the above comes into play.
One could
Dear list...
the matter has been discussed at least twice already. Roberto C. Sanchez
brought the matter back up in January 2008. The response was very positive
but nobody wanted to implement that. Several Debian end users in my circle
would surely be happy about having screenshots available
Hi,
Christoph Haas wrote:
- Propose a new optional debian/control field X-Screenshot: pointing to
an URL serving an image file (PNG, JPG)
I don't think this is needed and could significantly bloat Packages.gz
- Create a new tree on hg.debian.org to host screenshots.
- Alternatively
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:05:03PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
So I'd like to get things moving. I assume we had to do this:
Before people submit dozens of screenshots all looking slightly
different, I suggest first deciding on some standards, like making sure
screenshots use the default GTK or
A note: the games team has implemented goplay (debtags based game
browser that uses games-thumbnails) and games-thumbnails (a big .deb
of small screenshots).
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
* Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080722 17:27]:
Before people submit dozens of screenshots all looking slightly
different, I suggest first deciding on some standards, like making sure
screenshots use the default GTK or Qt theme Debian uses.
Also, we should probably include window
Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:05:03PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
So I'd like to get things moving. I assume we had to do this:
Before people submit dozens of screenshots all looking slightly
different, I suggest first deciding on some standards, like making sure
Leo costela Antunes wrote:
You could adopt a standard url syntax for referring to specific packages
(like screenshots.d.n/bin-package-name) and create a way for
maintainers to upload screenshots to it (via email, as you suggested,
perhaps).
This way we don't have to change anything in our
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Christoph Haas wrote:
- Propose a new optional debian/control field X-Screenshot: pointing to
an URL serving an image file (PNG, JPG)
[debian-devel-announce as soon as we are ready?]
You don't need/want such a field. It serves no practical purpose. There's
no reason to
Christoph,
Thanks for prodding again on this matter. I've been extremely busy.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:05:03PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
Dear list...
the matter has been discussed at least twice already. Roberto C. Sanchez
brought the matter back up in January 2008. The response was
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I can program that if needed. The only problem is probably
authenticating the maintainer. Maybe a simple email interface
checking PGP signatures will do. Needs further brainstorming.)
This is something that
John H. Robinson, IV dijo [Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 08:50:26AM -0700]:
I like the url suggestion. I propose one modification:
http://screenshots.d.n/bin-package-name/0
http://screenshots.d.n/bin-package-name/1
http://screenshots.d.n/bin-package-name/n
where image 0 is the default image
Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I can program that if needed. The only problem is probably
authenticating the maintainer. Maybe a simple email interface
checking PGP signatures will do. Needs further brainstorming.)
This is
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
John H. Robinson, IV dijo [Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 08:50:26AM -0700]:
I like the url suggestion. I propose one modification:
http://screenshots.d.n/bin-package-name/0
http://screenshots.d.n/bin-package-name/1
http://screenshots.d.n/bin-package-name/n
where image 0
Christoph Haas wrote:
Actually that doesn't sound too hard. And it would be a neat little
service. Let me know what you think and please step forward if you are
already working on something like that.
These links might be of your interest:
23 matches
Mail list logo
