On Thursday 30 of June 2005 12:13, Antony Gelberg wrote:
Hi all,
I have been thinking about packaging DBDesigner, a GUI tool for database
design. It's GPL but it requires Borland Kylix to compile. I've read
the policy doc, but am still confused. Is this contrib, non-free, or
not suitable
Hi all,
I have been thinking about packaging DBDesigner, a GUI tool for database
design. It's GPL but it requires Borland Kylix to compile. I've read
the policy doc, but am still confused. Is this contrib, non-free, or
not suitable for inclusion in Debian?
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Antony Gelberg wrote:
I have been thinking about packaging DBDesigner, a GUI tool for
database design. It's GPL but it requires Borland Kylix to
compile. Is this contrib, non-free, or not suitable for inclusion in
Debian?
contrib
--
Lionel
--
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 08:15:24PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 07:57:44PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I have been thinking about packaging DBDesigner, a GUI tool for
database design. It's GPL but it requires Borland Kylix to
compile. Is this contrib,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 08:16:17PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
I have a package [1] (gh - Generic Haskell [2]) with a GPL licence
which builds from generated sources with the tools available in
main. The generated sources and the source from which it is
generated are in the upstream tarball,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 07:57:44PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I have been thinking about packaging DBDesigner, a GUI tool for
database design. It's GPL but it requires Borland Kylix to
compile. Is this contrib, non-free, or not suitable for inclusion in
Debian?
contrib
Really?
Op do, 30-06-2005 te 20:59 +0200, schreef Lionel Elie Mamane:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 08:16:17PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
I have a package [1] (gh - Generic Haskell [2]) with a GPL licence
which builds from generated sources with the tools available in
main. The generated sources and
I have a similar question.
I have a package [1] (gh - Generic Haskell [2]) with a GPL licence which
builds from generated sources with the tools available in main. The
generated sources and the source from which it is generated are in the
upstream tarball, but to get the generated sources from
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 09:21:42PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
Op do, 30-06-2005 te 20:59 +0200, schreef Lionel Elie Mamane:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 08:16:17PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
I have a package [1] (gh - Generic Haskell [2]) with a GPL licence
which builds from generated sources
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I have already packaged uuagc, but I can not package frown yet, because
it isn't released yet. If uuagc is included in main I still need to
wait on frown although it is only needed for one file (which never
changes anyway), right?
Yes, you do.
You
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
You can ship the generated file instead.
No, that's not source code. To be in main, you must be able to build
from source using only tools in main.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
that I think of it, the last condition is pretty necessary for any
kind of security support... It may thus be a hard requirement rather
than it'd be better.
There isn't any guarantee of security support for non-free at least, and
I'd guess contrib as well.
--
To
12 matches
Mail list logo
