On Sat, Sep 16, 2006, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I checked the code of pbuilder-satisfydepends, and I see it tries all
> > versions of "apt-cache show" output to see whether one of them would be
> > enough, but I see no place where it would request a particular version.
> Yup, that's not supporte
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > except that you also would need to patch sbuild to build from
> > experimental. I've been giving that patch to everyone who's asked me for
> > it, but it's not in the official sbu
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:07:14PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> You also need to downgrade packages back to unstable when the build
>> needed some package from experimental. So you should pin to >1000 and
>> run apt-get dist-upgrade between bu
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 07:07:14PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> You also need to downgrade packages back to unstable when the build
> needed some package from experimental. So you should pin to >1000 and
> run apt-get dist-upgrade between builds as a minimum.
>
> Or just throw away the chr
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
>> Then I thought I might have forgotten APT::Default-Release, and with
>> APT::Default-Release set to "unstable", I could pin experimental higher
>> than 500, 700 for example, and it wouldn't upgrade the packages
>> automatically, however it
Hi,
> Then I thought I might have forgotten APT::Default-Release, and with
> APT::Default-Release set to "unstable", I could pin experimental higher
> than 500, 700 for example, and it wouldn't upgrade the packages
> automatically, however it still doesn't work.
>
> These are the scores of t
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Wouldn't pbuilder with a basic apt pinning setup be enough ?
It didn't work in the first place with pinning (it would either not try
installing packages from experimental or install them on upgrades too).
Then I thought I might have forgotten APT::Def
also sprach Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.08.1843 +0100]:
> Wouldn't pbuilder with a basic apt pinning setup be enough ?
Sure, it should work, but pbuilder-satisfydepends does not support
it. Or well, it did not. Looking at it now (0.155),
checkbuilddep_versiondeps seems to do some magi
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:30:14PM +0200, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'd like to setup a pbuilder or sbuild (preferably pbuilder, but I'm
> not sure it's possible) in the way I understand experimental buildds
> are setup: to only pull experimental software wh
Hi there,
I'd like to setup a pbuilder or sbuild (preferably pbuilder, but I'm
not sure it's possible) in the way I understand experimental buildds
are setup: to only pull experimental software when it's required by the
build-deps, but keep only unstable software when possible. I woul
10 matches
Mail list logo
