Hi Joerg,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 00:27, Joerg Jaspertjo...@debian.org wrote:
On 11813 March 1977, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Should we improve how we communicate in the project? Shouldn't there
be more information on what's moving behind the scenes? It's just me
that would like to know it?
First
Hi Philipp,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 00:41, Philipp Kerntr...@philkern.de wrote:
Hi,
On 2009-07-16, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
today ries (aka ftp-master) was down due to a scheduled maintenance activity.
more or less scheduled, as already stated.
Now, scheduled means programmed,
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:26, Michael Banckmba...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 08:25:19PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Should we improve how we communicate in the project?
One thing I want to turn your attention in addition to what the others
wrote is that -devel looks
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 00:27, Joerg Jaspertjo...@debian.org wrote:
First there wasnt much notice (as people already said), but also second:
The thing most important for us DDs, which is for the day-to-day work
the upload queue, is pointed elsewhere during
Hi Marc,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:35, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidth...@ftwca.de wrote:
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 00:27, Joerg Jaspertjo...@debian.org wrote:
First there wasnt much notice (as people already said), but also second:
The thing most important for us
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:41:05AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/09/msg6.html
Thanks for the pointer, but I'm referring to
the upload queue, is pointed elsewhere during that time,
not to the general reorganization of upload queues
Hi,
On Thu Jul 16, 2009 at 15:22:44 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
If you think we (DSA) are doing a bad job, please feel free to attand
DSA BoF on DC9 and lets talk about it there.
That implies to me that this is the only way to discuss the issue. Is
that what
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/09/msg6.html
Thanks for the pointer, but I'm referring to
the upload queue, is pointed elsewhere during that time,
not to the general reorganization of upload queues announced with that email.
It is *exactly* the point of
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:32, Joerg Jaspertjo...@debian.org wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/09/msg6.html
Thanks for the pointer, but I'm referring to
the upload queue, is pointed elsewhere during that time,
not to the general reorganization of upload queues
Hi,
On Fri Jul 17, 2009 at 12:51:34 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:32, Joerg Jaspertjo...@debian.org wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/09/msg6.html
Thanks for the pointer, but I'm referring to
the upload queue, is pointed elsewhere
Hi all,
today ries (aka ftp-master) was down due to a scheduled maintenance activity.
Now, scheduled means programmed, and suddenly this question comes to
me: should the project be notified of such core activities? should we
only relay on #debian-devel irc channel topic to know this?
ries is not
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 20:25 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Hi all,
today ries (aka ftp-master) was down due to a scheduled maintenance activity.
Now, scheduled means programmed, and suddenly this question comes to
me: should the project be notified of such core activities? should we
only relay
Hi,
On Thu Jul 16, 2009 at 20:16:06 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 20:25 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Hi all,
today ries (aka ftp-master) was down due to a scheduled maintenance
activity.
Now, scheduled means programmed, and suddenly this question comes to
me:
Hi!
Ben Hutchings schrieb:
Now, scheduled means programmed, and suddenly this question comes to
me: should the project be notified of such core activities? should we
only relay on #debian-devel irc channel topic to know this?
This is what debian-infrastructure-announce is for (though
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 20:25 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Hi all,
today ries (aka ftp-master) was down due to a scheduled maintenance
activity.
Now, scheduled means programmed, and suddenly this question comes to
me: should
Hi Martin,
thanks for replying (with your DSA hat on :) ).
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 21:24, Martin Zobel-Helaszo...@ftbfs.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu Jul 16, 2009 at 20:16:06 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 20:25 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Hi all,
today ries (aka ftp-master) was
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
If you think we (DSA) are doing a bad job, please feel free to attand
DSA BoF on DC9 and lets talk about it there.
That implies to me that this is the only way to discuss the issue. Is
that what you meant to imply?
I hope not; there are many people that can
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 21:24 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Thu Jul 16, 2009 at 20:16:06 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 20:25 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Hi all,
today ries (aka ftp-master) was down due to a scheduled maintenance
activity.
Now,
Hi Ben,
thanks for this and previous reply I didn't acknowledged (and all
others, of course ;) )
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 23:04, Ben Hutchingsb...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
advance notice, since many people do not use #debian-devel.
do not or can not: many company firewalls have IRC ports closed
On 11813 March 1977, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Should we improve how we communicate in the project? Shouldn't there
be more information on what's moving behind the scenes? It's just me
that would like to know it?
First there wasnt much notice (as people already said), but also second:
The thing most
Hi,
On 2009-07-16, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
today ries (aka ftp-master) was down due to a scheduled maintenance activity.
more or less scheduled, as already stated.
Now, scheduled means programmed, and suddenly this question comes to
me: should the project be notified of such core
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 08:25:19PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Should we improve how we communicate in the project?
One thing I want to turn your attention in addition to what the others
wrote is that -devel looks like the wrong list to me for
this kind of discussion.
I think -project would be
22 matches
Mail list logo
