Shouldn't tar 1.20-1 be in testing?

2008-08-04 Thread Vincent Lefevre
According to http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tar.html tar 1.20-1 entered unstable on 2008-04-17, so several months before the freeze. And http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=tar gives no good reasons for which tar is not in testing yet: * trying to update tar from 1.19-3

Re: Shouldn't tar 1.20-1 be in testing?

2008-08-04 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 15:34:40 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: tar 1.20-1 entered unstable on 2008-04-17, so several months before the freeze. The essential toolchain was frozen before the rest of the archive. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Shouldn't tar 1.20-1 be in testing?

2008-08-04 Thread Theodore Tso
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:43:51PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 15:34:40 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: tar 1.20-1 entered unstable on 2008-04-17, so several months before the freeze. The essential toolchain was frozen before the rest of the archive. Yes, but

Re: Shouldn't tar 1.20-1 be in testing?

2008-08-04 Thread Joey Hess
Theodore Tso wrote: I'm guessing that perhaps since tar is probably used by d-i d-i uses busybox's implementation of tar. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature