On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 11:00:46AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
So how many other developers are not using unstable?
Raul Miller wrote:
Perhaps this should be taken up on another list, if you expect input
from more than a few people.
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 02:43:25PM -0700, Joey Hess
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a general rule, as long as you can run the result in potato without
using oldlibs packages, it should be fine. [ Personal note: Most of the
packages I maintain depend on libc6 and nothing more. For this reason I
have not upgraded to potato yet. This
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 11:00:46AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
So how many other developers are not using unstable?
Perhaps this should be taken up on another list, if you expect input
from more than a few people.
For what it's worth, I'm using a slink system with potato in my
apt/sources.list,
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 11:00:46AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a general rule, as long as you can run the result in potato without
using oldlibs packages, it should be fine. [ Personal note: Most of the
packages I maintain depend on libc6 and nothing
Raul Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 11:00:46AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
So how many other developers are not using unstable?
Perhaps this should be taken up on another list, if you expect input
from more than a few people.
A list other than debian-devel? A list with a charter of
5 matches
Mail list logo