Re: Source build-dependencies

2013-05-30 Thread Stephen Kitt
On Thu, 16 May 2013 16:58:13 +0200, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 08:50:39 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Le 13/05/2013 15:51, Paul Wise a écrit : [...] as long as there is a way to build-depend on the

Re: Source build-dependencies

2013-05-16 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On 12-05-13 04:03, Paul Wise wrote: On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Wookey wrote: I'd vote for that too, as it would be very helpful for cross-toolchain building. I hadn't realised that source build-deps was a possibility. Is it? Does anyone have a proposal for how it might work? It

Re: Source build-dependencies

2013-05-16 Thread Guillem Jover
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 08:50:39 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Le 13/05/2013 15:51, Paul Wise a écrit : [...] as long as there is a way to build-depend on the build-dependencies for a source package, that should be fine. As a bonus we can

Re: Source build-dependencies

2013-05-14 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 06:03:30PM +0100, Wookey wrote: +++ Stephen Kitt [2013-05-09 10:46 +0200]: On Thu, 9 May 2013 10:10:01 +0200, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: * source build dependencies (such that e.g binutils-mingw-w64 build depends on src:binutils instead of binutils

Re: Source build-dependencies

2013-05-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote: Should a dependency of a source package src:A on src:foo not mean that src:A also automatically build depends on the build dependencies of src:foo? Not necessarily, src:A could be building with a different set of build options. For

Re: Source build-dependencies

2013-05-13 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 13/05/2013 15:51, Paul Wise a écrit : [...] as long as there is a way to build-depend on the build-dependencies for a source package, that should be fine. As a bonus we can get rid of mk-build-deps :) How so? -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Source build-dependencies

2013-05-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Le 13/05/2013 15:51, Paul Wise a écrit : [...] as long as there is a way to build-depend on the build-dependencies for a source package, that should be fine. As a bonus we can get rid of mk-build-deps :) How so? In my case, I already

Re: Source build-dependencies

2013-05-11 Thread Wookey
+++ Stephen Kitt [2013-05-09 10:46 +0200]: On Thu, 9 May 2013 10:10:01 +0200, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote: * source build dependencies (such that e.g binutils-mingw-w64 build depends on src:binutils instead of binutils-source) Yes! That was on my list as well ;-). The Built

Re: Source build-dependencies

2013-05-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Wookey wrote: I'd vote for that too, as it would be very helpful for cross-toolchain building. I hadn't realised that source build-deps was a possibility. Is it? Does anyone have a proposal for how it might work? It isn't a possibility yet, it could be if the

Re: Source build-dependencies

2013-05-11 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Paul Wise (2013-05-12 04:03:54) Another one I would like is to be able to depend or build-dep on foo:build-depends or foo [Build-Depends] (or by extension foo:depends), which would mean we could get rid of the ugly hack that is mk-build-deps. Should a dependency of a source