[Andreas Tille]
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 02:27:03PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> >
> > I've been thinking about this some as well for my personal domain.
> > Debian has tools that can determine the language of a document
> > (libtextcat and friends).
>
> So this is even better.
Amazingly,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:19:07AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
[...]
> I assume that a spell checker can be configured that way that it
> can distinguish between writing an English text with some /
> several mistakes and a text with say 50% error rate which is
> probably not understandable anyway.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 02:27:03PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
>
> I've been thinking about this some as well for my personal domain.
> Debian has tools that can determine the language of a document
> (libtextcat and friends).
So this is even better.
> Emails that are 70% or more composed of
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:19:07AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> since some time we get more and more SPAM which is easily to detect for
> me (and most probably automatically): SPAM in languages I do simply not
> understand and which are definitely not English. Wouldn't it be a
> reasonable means
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:42:49AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Andreas Tille, le Fri 11 Feb 2011 10:19:07 +0100, a écrit :
> > PS: I assume that a spell checker can be configured that way that it
> > can distinguish between writing an English text with some / several
> > mistakes and a
Hello Samuel Thibault,
Am 2011-02-11 10:42:49, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Andreas Tille, le Fri 11 Feb 2011 10:19:07 +0100, a écrit :
> > PS: I assume that a spell checker can be configured that way that it
> > can distinguish between writing an English text with some / several
> >
Samuel Thibault (11/02/2011):
> Mmm, I think we've already had users that have even 50% error rate,
> simply because they mispell things.
I like the intended pun!
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Andreas Tille, le Fri 11 Feb 2011 10:19:07 +0100, a écrit :
> PS: I assume that a spell checker can be configured that way that it
> can distinguish between writing an English text with some / several
> mistakes and a text with say 50% error rate which is probably not
> understandable a
Hi,
since some time we get more and more SPAM which is easily to detect for
me (and most probably automatically): SPAM in languages I do simply not
understand and which are definitely not English. Wouldn't it be a
reasonable means for a SPAM filter to mark mails which blatantly fail a
spell chec
9 matches
Mail list logo
