Horms wrote:
Debian isn't lowering priority on Linux 2.4 work but individual people
are.
I am one of the people who do work on 2.4 for debian,
I won't raise the hands of others.
Personally my focus is 2.4.27, because that is what will go
into sarge and right now I don't have the time to do
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:23:18PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:02:25PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
Converting to udev is an additional step, and caused me a lot more
work than the basic 2.6 upgrade (mostly getting my head around it, and
converting from usbmgr).
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 08:44:13AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:23:18PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:02:25PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
Converting to udev is an additional step, and caused me a lot more
work than the basic 2.6
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 12:33:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
AOL. magicdev works just fine to do essentially the same thing as
gnome-volume-manager.
I don't use magicdev either. I really prefer to mount my storage
device myself. Call me a control-freak.
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:18:33PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:16:44PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
2.6 is still too new as far as most ISVs are concerned, and so Debian
shouldn't lower the priority of work on 2.4 kernels too much just yet,
in my opinion.
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:02:25PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 02-Jan-05, 15:54 (CST), Stephan Niemz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, is there a guide somewhere telling how to switch an
unstable system from 2.4 to 2.6?
apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.whatever
Also
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:02:25PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
Converting to udev is an additional step, and caused me a lot more
work than the basic 2.6 upgrade (mostly getting my head around it, and
converting from usbmgr).
Converting to udev is in no way a part of converting to a 2.6
I demand that Stephan Niemz may or may not have written...
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 20:02:25 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
Converting to udev is an additional step, and caused me a lot more work
than the basic 2.6 upgrade (mostly getting my head around it, and
converting from usbmgr).
Yes,
Quoting Darren Salt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I demand that Stephan Niemz may or may not have written...
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 20:02:25 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
Converting to udev is an additional step, and caused me a lot more work
than the basic 2.6 upgrade (mostly getting my head
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 20:02:25 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
Converting to udev is an additional step, and caused me a lot more
work than the basic 2.6 upgrade (mostly getting my head around it, and
converting from usbmgr).
Yes, converting from devfs to udev is one thing that doesn't
By the way, is there a guide somewhere telling how to switch an
unstable system from 2.4 to 2.6?
An install of the appropinquate kernel-image package should do it. At
least it did for me on various ppc and an x86_64 installed as i386
system.
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:19:57AM +0100, Stephan Niemz wrote:
Yes, converting from devfs to udev is one thing that doesn't seem
to be easy. Another one is the ISDN support. Hasn't that changed
significantly, too? And what's going to happen with /etc/modutils/*,
how much manual tweaking
The kernel version 2.4.28 is out for almost seven weeks now.
Does anybody know about the status of the corresponding Debian
packages? And is there an estimation for when the kernel-patch-*
packages will support the new kernel version?
Thanks,
- Stephan.
signature.asc
Description:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 07:37:59PM +0100, Stephan Niemz wrote:
The kernel version 2.4.28 is out for almost seven weeks now.
Does anybody know about the status of the corresponding Debian
packages? And is there an estimation for when the kernel-patch-*
packages will support the new kernel
On 2 Jan 2005, at 7:16 pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 07:37:59PM +0100, Stephan Niemz wrote:
The kernel version 2.4.28 is out for almost seven weeks now.
Does anybody know about the status of the corresponding Debian
packages? And is there an estimation for when the
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:16:44PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
2.6 is still too new as far as most ISVs are concerned, and so Debian
shouldn't lower the priority of work on 2.4 kernels too much just yet,
in my opinion.
Debian isn't lowering priority on Linux 2.4 work but individual people
are.
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 20:16:19 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Any reason you're not using 2.6 kernels?
Yes. I'd like to switch to 2.6, but I suspect it would break
certain things. There are too many changes and I don't have the time to
go through this at the moment. Still I'd like to
On 02-Jan-05, 15:54 (CST), Stephan Niemz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, is there a guide somewhere telling how to switch an
unstable system from 2.4 to 2.6?
apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.whatever
Seriously, that Worked For Me. It wasn't a big deal.
However, as usual, It depends: If
18 matches
Mail list logo
