On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 00:39 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:35:33PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
[...]
> > But I'm not aware of a git tree holding the debian kernels - SVN is
> > still listed as the VCS for the linux-2.6 package (which, BTW,
> > continues to surprise me).
>
>
On Tue, Mar 23 2010, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Let's maybe stay focussed on the initial problem: we *had* a way to
> handle kernel patches as part of a self-contained distribution, but
> there is no support for this any more. Moreover that support we had
> was not 100% satisfactory (eg. bad handling
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:35:33PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:17:22AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:14:59 +0100
> > Yann Dirson wrote:
> > > So the question is, is it time to request removal of those packages,
> > > or is there any remaining rea
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:57:01AM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 05:39:00PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 05:28:33PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > >On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:17:22AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > >>On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:14:59 +0
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:17:22AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:14:59 +0100
> Yann Dirson wrote:
> > So the question is, is it time to request removal of those packages,
> > or is there any remaining reason not to do so that I missed ?
>
> As linux-patch-tomoyo1.7 package
[this and the following mails are resent versions, my mails did not
make it to the list due to some config problem - sorry for any dups
this may cause]
Since April 2009, kernel-package has no use any more for the
{kernel,linux}-patch-* packages (AFAIK the current recommended way of
patching a kern
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 05:28:33PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:17:22AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:14:59 +0100
Yann Dirson wrote:
> So the question is, is it time to request removal of those
> packages, or is there any remaining reason not to do
Hi Yann
Thanks for the reminder. Yes it is time to remove at least the openvz
kernel patch package.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 03:14:59PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Since April 2009, kernel-package has no use any more for the
> {kernel,linux}-patch-* packages (AFAIK the curre
Hi,
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:14:59 +0100
Yann Dirson wrote:
> So the question is, is it time to request removal of those packages,
> or is there any remaining reason not to do so that I missed ?
As linux-patch-tomoyo1.7 package maintainer, tomoyo is merged with
mainline, but it's not fully feat
9 matches
Mail list logo
