Re: Suggestion: binfmt_misc handling

1999-10-04 Thread Brian May
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: Basically what you can do is create a directory called /etc/binfmt_misc and put a bunch of files in it; each file should be a series of lines where each line is a directive for the binfmt_misc registration file in /proc. So the incantation for Java is:

Re: Suggestion: binfmt_misc handling

1999-10-04 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 09:37:02AM +1000, Brian May was heard to say: Packages such as Wine, Kaffe, dosemu, and perhaps Frotz would drop a file into this directory announcing their support of a binary format. The files wouldn't actually be interpreted unless this init.d script is installed;

Re: Suggestion: binfmt_misc handling

1999-10-04 Thread Brian May
2. Suggestion: Would it be possible to somehow integrate this with /etc/mailcap, which already has good support in packages? There are different ways you could do this, eg have in the config file lines that look like: :Java:M::\xca\xfe\xba\xbe::application/x-java:

Suggestion: binfmt_misc handling

1999-10-03 Thread Daniel Burrows
Hello, I was just poking around on my system and found a script I wrote back when kernel 2.2 was released. It was an experiment to see if I could easily handle registration and deregistration of binary formats (with binfmt_misc) -- it just occured to me that Debian might be interested in it,

Re: Suggestion: binfmt_misc handling

1999-10-03 Thread Daniel Burrows
Oops. On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 10:06:02AM -0400, Daniel Burrows was heard to say: test -e /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc || exit 0 That maybe should be test -d ... (although the above works even on ash) Daniel -- Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped. --

Re: Suggestion: binfmt_misc handling

1999-10-03 Thread Raul Miller
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 10:06:02AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: [ as I understand it, a security 'breach' could only occur with this system if a user had execute permissions but *not* read permissions on a file that wasn't of a normal executable format; in other words: rwx--x--x

Re: Suggestion: binfmt_misc handling

1999-10-03 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 11:30:04AM -0400, Raul Miller was heard to say: On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 10:06:02AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: [ as I understand it, a security 'breach' could only occur with this system if a user had execute permissions but *not* read permissions on a file that