On Mon,20.Oct.08, 00:51:03, s. keeling wrote:
> Just curious, but why 2 & 3? Why isn't 1 considered the simplest
> solution? xterm is ca. 300k. What Seyon users can't afford 300k disk
> space or its RSS?
>
> vi's installed on every *nix box on the planet. Why shouldn't xterm
> be on every X
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I've brought this up in the past on debian-devel, but didn't follow
> through at the time. We have lots of X-based terminal programs (xterm,
> rxvt, gnome-terminal, konsole, ...) which Provide:
> x-terminal-emulator. That's great and useful, but the comm
Sune Vuorela, le Mon 13 Oct 2008 05:34:25 +, a écrit :
> On 2008-10-12, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sune wrote:
> >>I dont think supporting title and stuff should be required for providing
> >>x-terminal-emulator. I think we could require to handle -e properly, but
> >>not muc
On 2008-10-12, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sune wrote:
>>I dont think supporting title and stuff should be required for providing
>>x-terminal-emulator. I think we could require to handle -e properly, but
>>not much more than that.
>
> Out of curiosity, why not support setting of ti
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 06:12:03PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I want to fix this, but do it right. I can see some options here:
The initiative is interesting, and exactly one of those in which
distributions can help out upstreams.
Still, I propose an alternative approach. What about starting
Sune wrote:
>On 2008-10-12, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 3. Write a wrapper script to deal with each possible terminal program
>> and map from a standard set of options to the specific options for
>> that program.
>>
>> Ideally, I'd like us to do a combination of #2 and
On 2008-10-12, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've brought this up in the past on debian-devel, but didn't follow
> through at the time. We have lots of X-based terminal programs (xterm,
> rxvt, gnome-terminal, konsole, ...) which Provide:
> x-terminal-emulator. That's great and useful
Excerpts from Steve McIntyre's message of Sun Oct 12 13:12:03 -0400 2008:
> Ideally, I'd like us to do a combination of #2 and #3: work out the
> standard set of options, and have each package provide a wrapper
> script as necessary to support those options.
I'd be happy to do this for rxvt-unico
Hi,
Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> I want to fix this, but do it right. I can see some options here:
>
> 1. Force all seyon users to install xterm by using a direct
> dependency on *just* xterm and call it instead of
> x-terminal-emulator
>
> 2. Work out a standard set of command line opt
Hi folks,
I've brought this up in the past on debian-devel, but didn't follow
through at the time. We have lots of X-based terminal programs (xterm,
rxvt, gnome-terminal, konsole, ...) which Provide:
x-terminal-emulator. That's great and useful, but the command line
interfaces to some of those hav
10 matches
Mail list logo
