Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 436520 There is no policy on HTTP_PROXY variable
Bug#436520: apt-listbugs: does not work with $http_proxy
Changed Bug title to `There is no policy on HTTP_PROXY variable' from
`apt-listbugs: does not work with $http_proxy'.
(By the way, that
Hi,
HTTP_PROXY, or http_proxy (and ftp_proxy) is used in many
applications within Debian.
There is a well-known remote attack using HTTP_* variables can be
set to arbitrary values for CGI scripts, and thus there is a need
for protection against that.
Is there any reason why
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:34:51PM -0700, Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
HTTP_PROXY, or http_proxy (and ftp_proxy) is used in many
applications within Debian.
There is a well-known remote
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 436520 general
Bug#436520: apt-listbugs: does not work with $http_proxy
Bug reassigned from package `apt-listbugs' to `general'.
retitle There is no policy on HTTP_PROXY variable
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
thanks
reassign 436520 general
retitle There is no policy on HTTP_PROXY variable
thanks
Hi,
I'm reassigning this bug to Debian in general. I feel a Deja-Vu about
this, I thought I already discussed it somewhere but cannot find it
anywhere.
HTTP_PROXY, or http_proxy (and ftp_proxy) is used in many
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
HTTP_PROXY, or http_proxy (and ftp_proxy) is used in many
applications within Debian.
There is a well-known remote attack using HTTP_* variables can be
set to arbitrary values for CGI scripts, and thus there is a need
for protection against that.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:34:51PM -0700, Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
HTTP_PROXY, or http_proxy (and ftp_proxy) is used in many
applications within Debian.
There is a well-known remote attack using HTTP_* variables can be
set to
7 matches
Mail list logo