Some transitions for which there was an upload block in place have been
completed and the block has been automatically lifted:
The following transitions were removed:
Looking at transition: xz-utils-transition
Source: xz-utils
New Version: 4.999.9beta+20100212-4
Responsible: Marc Brockschmidt
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> It's mainly (slightly) confusing on the debian-boot list. At least I have
> occasionally had to look twice before remembering that those mails are
> about the archive and not D-I. I agree it wasn't a huge issue.
Confirmed. I had the same issue from time
Jörg Jaspert wrote:
> Frans Pop (Thu, 21 May 2009 20:54:22 +0200):
>> > From: Debian Installer
>>
>> Although this usage probably predates D-I, I do find it quite confusing
>> in practice, and for example when googling, that we currently have two
>> completely unrelated usages of the term "Debian
On 11759 March 1977, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Frans Pop (Thu, 21 May 2009 20:54:22 +0200):
>> > From: Debian Installer
>> Although this usage probably predates D-I, I do find it quite confusing in
>> practice, and for example when googling, that we currently have two
>> completely unrelated usa
+ Frans Pop (Thu, 21 May 2009 20:54:22 +0200):
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > From: Debian Installer
> Although this usage probably predates D-I, I do find it quite confusing in
> practice, and for example when googling, that we currently have two
> completely unrelated usages of the term "Debian
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> From: Debian Installer
Although this usage probably predates D-I, I do find it quite confusing in
practice, and for example when googling, that we currently have two
completely unrelated usages of the term "Debian Installer".
Would the FTP master team consider changing t
+ Jonathan Wiltshire (Thu, 21 May 2009 19:00:09 +0100):
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:54:52PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I thought it could perhaps be a good idea to CC them to -devel. Does
> > somebody think we shouldn't do that? (I'd send a patch to include the
> > name of the transition in
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:54:52PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> I thought it could perhaps be a good idea to CC them to -devel. Does
> somebody think we shouldn't do that? (I'd send a patch to include the
> name of the transition in the Subject.)
Would -devel-changes be more appropriate? though I
include the
name of the transition in the Subject.)
Cheers,
- Forwarded message from Debian Installer
-
From: Debian Installer
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 15:28:29 +
Subject: Transitions Completed
The following transitions are complete and have been removed
from the transitions
9 matches
Mail list logo
