Re: Trying to understand "updating orbit2 makes 79 packages unintallable ..."

On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 02:22:14PM +0100, Sebastian Rittau wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:24:05PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out the reason why orbit2 is blocked from testing, > > I can only guess, but I think it is because of orbit2's conflict with > liblinc-dev. I would

Re: Trying to understand "updating orbit2 makes 79 packages unintallable ..."

On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:24:05PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote: > I'm trying to figure out the reason why orbit2 is blocked from testing, I can only guess, but I think it is because of orbit2's conflict with liblinc-dev. I would really like to see ORBit2 2.8 to go into testing, since I plan to remove t

Re: Trying to understand "updating orbit2 makes 79 packages unintallable ..."

On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:24:05PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote: > I'm trying to figure out the reason why orbit2 is blocked from testing, > see > > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=orbit2 > > I understand the problem in principle: there is/are some package/s that > needs the older version

Trying to understand "updating orbit2 makes 79 packages unintallable ..."

I'm trying to figure out the reason why orbit2 is blocked from testing, see http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=orbit2 I understand the problem in principle: there is/are some package/s that needs the older version of orbit2, and the other "uninstallable" packages depend on these. Ide