Re: UDD gatherer for DDTP translations (Was: Extended descriptions size)

2009-04-12 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Andreas Tille til...@rki.de wrote: Well, I did not said that it is actually hard and in UDD you can get this easily by   SELECT md5(description || E'\n' || long_description || E'\n' ) AS md5          FROM packages WHERE ... Ok, I see why you're having trouble

Re: UDD gatherer for DDTP translations (Was: Extended descriptions size)

2009-04-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:   SELECT md5(description || E'\n' || long_description || E'\n' ) AS md5          FROM packages WHERE ... Ok, I see why you're having trouble now; you're splitting up the description in your DB and thus need to stick it back together. That's

Re: UDD gatherer for DDTP translations (Was: Extended descriptions size)

2009-04-07 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: While I'm not against the idea of version numbers (though it would have to be a list since a single translation may apply to dozens of versions) This might be discussed. it's not that hard to identify the description you want. What I often

Re: UDD gatherer for DDTP translations (Was: Extended descriptions size)

2009-04-05 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Andreas Tille til...@rki.de wrote: On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Then the version number will not be needed when an arch lags behind. The translation for the old md5sum can just be kept. Well, this thread was missused to discuss several

UDD gatherer for DDTP translations (Was: Extended descriptions size)

2009-04-01 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Then the version number will not be needed when an arch lags behind. The translation for the old md5sum can just be kept. Well, this thread was missused to discuss several issues. Would you mind reading my original posting why version numbers