I opened an upstream bug report with ntp. But I would rather see the
default get changed. I think there are just too many
people/applications that assume a certain behaviour that's different
then what we have now.
Exactly, especially in IPv4 round robin using DNS is a a de-facto
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
I opened an upstream bug report with ntp. But I would rather see the
default get changed. I think there are just too many
people/applications that assume a certain behaviour that's different
then what we have now.
Exactly, especially in
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 12:21:02PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Imho Debian's ctte should decide about this, and if they decide to have
sorted IPv4 addresses by default, somebody needs to take care that _ALL_
programs using IPv4 are changed. Including browsers, IM clients and all
daemons which
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 12:21:02PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Imho Debian's ctte should decide about this, and if they decide to have
sorted IPv4 addresses by default, somebody needs to take care that _ALL_
programs using IPv4 are changed.
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 06:40:19PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Is there any advantage for that default in Debian? Anyone who cares about
network proximity on round-robin IPv4 already knows to pick one host and
to stop using the round-robin names.
There's a configure option for
On Sat, 08 Sep 2007, Michael Banck wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 06:40:19PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Is there any advantage for that default in Debian? Anyone who cares about
network proximity on round-robin IPv4 already knows to pick one host and
to stop using the
Hi,
On Wed Sep 05, 2007 at 20:41:51 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Hi,
35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
unreachable on port 80 from all the networks I have access to for days.
This is ftp.egr.msu.edu.
created as RT#171
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
unreachable on port 80 from all the networks I have access to for days.
This is ftp.egr.msu.edu.
It is also still listed at http://www.debian.org/mirror/list
It is listed bad
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:24:24AM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
I also notice that we have 4 servers listed under the name
http.us.debian.org
Using host from bind9-host,
$ host http.us.debian.org
http.us.debian.org has address 128.101.240.212
http.us.debian.org has address 204.152.191.7
On Thu, Sep 6, 2007 at 09:24:24 -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
However, libc6 resolv+ (I think - can someone confirm who is to
blame?) goes out of its way to *sort* the list by IP number and thus
thwarts the round-robin. Aptitude (and wget, c) *always* choose
35.9.37.225. This server must be
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:24:24AM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
Using host from bind9-host,
$ host http.us.debian.org
http.us.debian.org has address 128.101.240.212
http.us.debian.org has address 204.152.191.7
http.us.debian.org has address 35.9.37.225
http.us.debian.org has address
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
See http://bugs.debian.org/438179
This bug was closed by adding a config option. Why wasn't it cloned to
all the network clients (apt, ntp, etc) that exhibit undesirable
behavior due to this change in glibc? Perhaps because the list is too
long for anyone to enumerate it.
--
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:19:51PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
See http://bugs.debian.org/438179
This bug was closed by adding a config option. Why wasn't it cloned to
all the network clients (apt, ntp, etc) that exhibit undesirable
behavior due to this change in glibc?
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:24:24AM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
Using host from bind9-host,
$ host http.us.debian.org
http.us.debian.org has address 128.101.240.212
http.us.debian.org has address 204.152.191.7
http.us.debian.org has address
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 08:41:51PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
unreachable on port 80 from all the networks I have access to for days.
This is ftp.egr.msu.edu.
Its admin are in BCC of this mail.
It is also still listed at
Hi,
35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
unreachable on port 80 from all the networks I have access to for days.
This is ftp.egr.msu.edu.
It is also still listed at http://www.debian.org/mirror/list
It is listed bad at http://mirror.debian.org/status.html
Can
I get the same thing as well.
Lots of my machines hang on pulling package lists sometimes, and they
hang for sure on package updates.
Tom
On Wed, Sep
05, 2007 at 08:41:51PM
-0500,
John Goerzen wrote:
Hi,
35.9.37.225, in http.us.debian.org, and ftp.us.debian.org, has been
unreachable on
17 matches
Mail list logo
