Svante Signell dijo [Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 09:52:36AM +0100]:
> Most people I meet (and installing Linux) choose to install some kind of
> Ubuntu distribution. At the same time the number of people installing
> Debian is declining as discussed here lately. Something has gone
> completely wrong with
Hi Svante,
Thank you for sharing this information in debian-devel. Much appreciated.
Even though some say it is off-topic (technically speaking),
I'm sure we must know such things.
Personally I doubt if I would notice this information somewhere else.
Thank you.
Regards,
Dmitry.
--
To UNSUB
Le dimanche 09 décembre 2012 à 00:46 +0100, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
>
> > We should make sure that people have to ask our permission before they use
> > our code for any other purpose! And make sure they can't do evil with it!
> That would be proprietary software...
.-'---`-.
,' `.
> We should make sure that people have to ask our permission before they use
> our code for any other purpose! And make sure they can't do evil with it!
That would be proprietary software...
--
Salvo Tomaselli
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 12:09:10AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> this time installing surveillance code.
>
> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/12/07/1527225/rms-speaks-out-against-ubuntu
> http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/ubuntu-spyware-what-to-do
"Again"? Looks like old news.
--
WBR, wRAR
signa
Le Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 07:06:02PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 10:41:37AM +0100, Svante Signell a écrit :
> >
> > Maybe debian-devel is not the
> > correct list, but the decline of Debian users was discussed here and not
> > considered off-topic.
>
> Hi Svante,
>
>
Le Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 10:41:37AM +0100, Svante Signell a écrit :
>
> Maybe debian-devel is not the
> correct list, but the decline of Debian users was discussed here and not
> considered off-topic.
Hi Svante,
I confirm that debian-devel is not the correct list. Its scope is not defined
by the
On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 10:11 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 09:52:36AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Something has gone completely wrong with the PR for Debian, suffering
> > from the success of derived distributions like Ubuntu.
>
> You are welcome to join the effort
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 09:52:36AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Something has gone completely wrong with the PR for Debian, suffering
> from the success of derived distributions like Ubuntu.
You are welcome to join the efforts of the people on the
debian-publicity mailing list that work daily on
On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 00:34 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le samedi, 8 décembre 2012 00.09:10, Svante Signell a écrit :
> > this time installing surveillance code.
>
> While these concerns are certainly serious, they do not concern the
> "Development of Debian".
In fact it does, see belo
Hi,
On Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 00:08:36 +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 7 December 2012 23:36, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Svante Signell writes:
> >
> >> this time installing surveillance code.
> >
> >> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/12/07/1527225/rms-speaks-out-against-ubuntu
> >> http://www.
I think RMS has done exactly what needed doing. Ubuntu is trying to find a way
to generate revenue and RMS raises some perfectly points about why he
disagrees. He is exactly the right guy to speak out about it because it is in
line with his "brand image". Kind of like shock-jock, Howard Stern, p
On 7 December 2012 23:36, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Svante Signell writes:
>
>> this time installing surveillance code.
>
>> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/12/07/1527225/rms-speaks-out-against-ubuntu
>> http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/ubuntu-spyware-what-to-do
>
>> Any reason Debian should be so clo
Svante Signell writes:
> this time installing surveillance code.
> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/12/07/1527225/rms-speaks-out-against-ubuntu
> http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/ubuntu-spyware-what-to-do
> Any reason Debian should be so closely linked to Ubuntu?
We should make sure that people
Le samedi, 8 décembre 2012 00.09:10, Svante Signell a écrit :
> this time installing surveillance code.
While these concerns are certainly serious, they do not concern the
"Development of Debian".
> Any reason Debian should be so closely linked to Ubuntu?
No reason besides the fact that a cent
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 12:09:10AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
>> this time installing surveillance code.
>
>> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/12/07/1527225/rms-speaks-out-against-ubuntu
>> http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/ubuntu-spyware-what
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 12:09:10AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> this time installing surveillance code.
> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/12/07/1527225/rms-speaks-out-against-ubuntu
> http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/ubuntu-spyware-what-to-do
> Any reason Debian should be so closely linked to Ub
17 matches
Mail list logo
