On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason why a Debian should spend resources to maintain
things that are not good enough for Debian?
Debian isn't being asked to do any such thing. I've been thinking
about doing this for a long time, one of
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, William Pitcock wrote:
But if you are worried about the QA and security team, then why not
create an unsupported repo. It could even be a good solution towards
recruiting new DDs.
Lets call it, say, 'community', 'extras', or 'unsupported'.
Please don't!
Kind regards
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, William Pitcock wrote:
But if you are worried about the QA and security team, then why not
create an unsupported repo. It could even be a good solution towards
recruiting new DDs.
Lets
I created an updated description. Please see below.
One thing i forgot to mention earlier was the feature of logging the http
requests
directly to a mysql-database.
I'm not quite sure, but I think this feature is not supported by most other
webservers.
Description: small http server
Monkey is
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
unsupported.d.n could be the right place for packages that are not
good enough for Debian (yet).
Is there any reason why a Debian should spend resources to maintain
things that are not good enough for Debian? For the not good enough
_yet_ there is
5 matches
Mail list logo
