On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 12:04:29PM -0400, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
So far, Alpha is looking near ready and we are shooting to
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is one, MAJOR, huge, massive, 'program' which egcs will not
properly compile, this is the kernel, 2.0.x is officially not going to
operate 100% correctly when compiled with gcc 2.8.x or egcs..
Any suggestions?
On the Alpha? I've had
So far, Alpha is looking near ready and we are shooting to release with
slink/i386. A caveat, however, is that we need to resolve some big egcs
issues SOON or else we can't release (as is, 1.1b will not compile two or
three vital packages correctly).
There is one, MAJOR, huge, massive,
On Wed 14 Oct 1998, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 12:04:29PM -0400, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
slink/i386. A caveat, however, is that we need to resolve some big egcs
issues SOON or else we can't release (as is, 1.1b will not compile two or
three vital packages
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 01:50:33PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
I last compiled (with success) 2.0.36pre2 with gcc version egcs-2.90.29
980515 (egcs 1.0.3 release) (according to /proc/version). That works
perfectly with ISDN and all, and stayed up for a month until I upgraded
sysvinit which
Oh, i can generate a kernel-image_2.1.125-1_powerpc.deb along with source
and dsc files and upload it to master, but will you and the other arch
maintainer agree with this??
If it's a powerpc package only, I don't see why there would be a problem.
It should get installed
--On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 1:12 pm +0200 Christian Meder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* if there's a stabilized snapshot newbies will get (hopefully) a
softer introduction in the wonders of the Linux-Sparc/Powerpc/Arm/...
world
I see your argument. I'm worried that we might be perceived as
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 11:49:59PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
--On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 12:14 am +0200 Christian Meder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:05:25AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
Brian == Brian White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Could I get some
On Thu 15 Oct 1998, J.H.M. Dassen Ray wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 01:50:33PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
I last compiled (with success) 2.0.36pre2 with gcc version egcs-2.90.29
980515 (egcs 1.0.3 release) (according to /proc/version). That works
perfectly with ISDN and all, and stayed
On Thu 15 Oct 1998, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is one, MAJOR, huge, massive, 'program' which egcs will not
properly compile, this is the kernel, 2.0.x is officially not going to
operate 100% correctly when compiled with gcc 2.8.x or
Paul Slootman wrote:
The last time I tried (about 10 sec. ago, on a.d.nl :-):
make[2]: Entering directory `/extra/home/debian/psl/kernel/linux/drivers/net'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/extra/home/debian/psl/kernel/linux/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
If we call it something like a 'developer' release, or an 'early-access'
release, then it sounds like a great idea, yes... as long as people don't
get the impression that it is a full 2.1 release.
Ok, under this impression powerpc is ready to go.
I'll upload 2.1 kernel source and images
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
---
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:15:51AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
PowerPC has
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
So far, Alpha is looking near ready and we are shooting to release with
slink/i386. A caveat, however, is that we need to resolve some big
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
So far, Alpha is looking near ready and we are shooting to release with
slink/i386. A caveat, however, is that we need to resolve some big egcs
issues SOON or else we can't
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
Probably 4-6 weeks. I'd like to ship it before the end of November.
Fantastic!
Guy, is there any problem with freezing the alpha architecture some time
after the main freeze?
About the only thing I'm really concerned with is egcs. As much as I hate
Brian White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
ARM is nowhere near being release ready (we just started).
Cheers,
- Jim
Brian == Brian White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Could I get some official word on which architectures wish
Brian to be included in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
I don't think sparc is ready to go, though Johnnie or Eric may see it
differently.
Ultrasparc definately isn't.
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
hurd-i386 is certainly not ready.
BTW: Considering the great amount of Cc:s in the original post, I have
decided to trim a little bit the
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
PowerPC has more or less given up on making 2.1. We're moving well,
but I'm of the inclination we shouldn't release until we have a truly
stabilized libc - or at least until
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
PowerPC has more or less given up on making 2.1. We're moving well,
but I'm of the inclination we shouldn't release until we have a truly
stabilized libc - or at least
We need a 2.1.x kernel source package, which isn't available for debian.
I don't see why you couldn't create one just for the powerpc arch. Either
way, v2.2 of the kernel should be available before v2.2 of Debian.
Yes, last rumors say that linux-2.2 came out short before christmas.
Oh, i
We need a 2.1.x kernel source package, which isn't available for debian.
I don't see why you couldn't create one just for the powerpc arch. Either
way, v2.2 of the kernel should be available before v2.2 of Debian.
Yes, last rumors say that linux-2.2 came out short before christmas.
Please wait about 2 days. Geert and Paul have finished the last of their
commits and I'm putting in a few small changes today and tomorrow.
}Yes, last rumors say that linux-2.2 came out short before christmas.
}
}Oh, i can generate a kernel-image_2.1.125-1_powerpc.deb along with source
}and dsc
Oh, i can generate a kernel-image_2.1.125-1_powerpc.deb along with source
and dsc files and upload it to master, but will you and the other arch
maintainer agree with this??
If it's a powerpc package only, I don't see why there would be a problem.
It should get installed automatically
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:05:25AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
Brian == Brian White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Could I get some official word on which architectures wish
Brian to be included in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
I don't think sparc is ready to go, though
--On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 12:14 am +0200 Christian Meder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:05:25AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
Brian == Brian White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Could I get some official word on which architectures wish
Brian to be included in
Brian Could I get some official word on which architectures wish
Brian to be included in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
I don't think sparc is ready to go, though Johnnie or Eric may see it
differently.
I'm neither Johnnie nor Eric but I think the basic tools on sparc
29 matches
Mail list logo
