Re: Updating packages' l10n without risk (~unrelated to previous)

2003-08-27 Thread Martin Quinson
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:12:07AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 10:27:44PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:10:06AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > > > > > And, as Steve pointed out, translatio

Re: Updating packages' l10n without risk (~unrelated to previous)

2003-08-25 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 10:27:44PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:10:06AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > > > And, as Steve pointed out, translation stuff is minimalistically > > > invasive so this does not require an enor

Updating packages' l10n without risk (~unrelated to previous)

2003-08-25 Thread Martin Quinson
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:10:06AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > And, as Steve pointed out, translation stuff is minimalistically > > invasive so this does not require an enormous amount of attention > > after the NMU. > > Yes, but there are new li