On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Not yet switched but renewed the old name, advertising new site one only
in words - not technically with 301 redirection (yes, unsupported by APT
but could be put on e.g. front page)
The APT http method support redirects
On 12-05-14 at 09:51am, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Not yet switched but renewed the old name, advertising new site one
only in words - not technically with 301 redirection (yes,
unsupported by APT but could be put on
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On 12-05-14 at 09:51am, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Not yet switched but renewed the old name, advertising new site one
only in words - not technically
Hi,
I'm going to reintroduce unversioned libnspr4 and libnss3 for various
reasons. These packages used to exist in the Debian archive, but the
last time they were seen was in sarge. The first release *not* including
them was etch. This is quite some time ago.
The versions they had by then had an
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make the new
versions greater than these, I have to add an epoch. But do I really
need to care about making the new versions greater than these packages
last seen 4 years ago?
On 12-05-13 at 11:16am, Mike Hommey wrote:
I'm going to reintroduce unversioned libnspr4 and libnss3 for various
reasons. These packages used to exist in the Debian archive, but the
last time they were seen was in sarge. The first release *not*
including them was etch. This is quite some
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:16:13AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to reintroduce unversioned libnspr4 and libnss3 for various
reasons. These packages used to exist in the Debian archive, but the
last time they were seen was in sarge. The first release *not* including
them was etch.
On 12-05-13 at 11:49am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make the
new versions greater than these, I have to add an epoch. But do I
really need to care about making the new versions
On 12-05-13 at 12:16pm, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:16:13AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
I'm going to reintroduce unversioned libnspr4 and libnss3 for
various reasons. These packages used to exist in the Debian archive,
but the last time they were seen was in sarge. The
On 2012-05-13 11:49 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make the new
versions greater than these, I have to add an epoch. But do I really
need to care about making the new versions
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:40:14 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-05-13 11:49 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make the new
versions greater than these, I have to add an
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-05-13 11:49 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make the new
versions greater than these, I have to add an
Le Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:16:13AM +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
Hi,
I'm going to reintroduce unversioned libnspr4 and libnss3 for various
reasons. These packages used to exist in the Debian archive, but the
last time they were seen was in sarge. The first release *not* including
them was
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 02:23:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Sounds like it would be safer to go with an epoch.
You could vary the package name slightly instead, but I don't have a suggestion
as to how, and you have to live with either.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 06:28:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-05-13 at 11:49am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make the
new versions greater than these, I have to add an epoch.
Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org writes:
I'm going to reintroduce unversioned libnspr4 and libnss3 for various
reasons. These packages used to exist in the Debian archive, but the
last time they were seen was in sarge. The first release *not* including
them was etch. This is quite some time ago.
On 12-05-13 at 10:51am, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 06:28:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-05-13 at 11:49am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they had by then had an epoch. Supposedly, to make
the new
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 13:41:13, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-05-13 at 10:51am, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 06:28:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-05-13 at 11:49am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 13 May 2012 11:16:13 +0200, a écrit :
The versions they
18 matches
Mail list logo
