Re: Wanted: maintainer for git's emacs support

2011-02-22 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Rémi Vanicat writes: > If there should be a change in maintenance of magit, I would be very > interested because I'm one of the main upstream developer. Sorry for being quiet about this but see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/10/msg00043.html Now that squeeze has released I think thi

Re: Wanted: maintainer for git's emacs support

2011-02-21 Thread Rémi Vanicat
David Bremner writes: > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:18:38 -0600, Jonathan Nieder > wrote: > >> None of the current Debian git maintainers seem to use emacs. This >> means git's emacs support[1] does not get as much care as it deserves: >> see for example bugs #611936, #611931, #611932, #611933, #61

Re: Wanted: maintainer for git's emacs support

2011-02-19 Thread David Bremner
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:18:38 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > None of the current Debian git maintainers seem to use emacs. This > means git's emacs support[1] does not get as much care as it deserves: > see for example bugs #611936, #611931, #611932, #611933, #611934, > #577834, and #611935. FW

Wanted: maintainer for git's emacs support

2011-02-18 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, None of the current Debian git maintainers seem to use emacs. This means git's emacs support[1] does not get as much care as it deserves: see for example bugs #611936, #611931, #611932, #611933, #611934, #577834, and #611935. The upstream maintainer is very friendly and responsive though he